Flex (read-only)

Revision: 3648 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-15 09:11:48 -0700 (Wed, 15 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Addendum to revision 3611 to protect against null systemManager. Reviewer: Ryan Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/components/baseClasses/FxComponent.as

Revision: 3638 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-14 16:49:56 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Changing the build order of swc file update with dita xml files. By default this would now happen during the checkintests target - so "ant clean main" shouldn't get affected. To opt out use -Dno.doc=true QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml

Revision: 3625 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-14 09:37:56 -0700 (Tue, 14 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Retry the change to update the swcs with dita based asdoc xml files. But this time with lazy read set to true. QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/swc/SwcCache.java

Revision: 3616 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-13 21:32:54 -0700 (Mon, 13 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Reverting the change for dita xml in swc files. Previous change significantly slowed down the compiler for larger multi library/modules apps.. QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml

Revision: 3611 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-13 17:41:10 -0700 (Mon, 13 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Make Gumbo components work in modules. Bugs: SDK-16070 QE: There are problems with unloading and re-loading modules. This is not specific to Gumbo components, and should be logged as a separate bug. Reviewer: Ryan Checkintests: Pass Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16070 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/components/baseClasses/FxComponent.as

Revision: 3602 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-13 15:08:16 -0700 (Mon, 13 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix non-windows build. QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml

Revision: 3598 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-13 13:32:58 -0700 (Mon, 13 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Modifying the build files to update the swcs with dita based asdoc xml files. The dita xml files should go under the docs folder inside the swc. QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml

Just wondering what people's thoughts on best practices for setting properties of Value Objects. For instance, I have several getter/setters in one of my Value Objects with logic in the setter that uses the value to set values of other properties. For example, I have a Value Object that has the following properties: category (of type Category, which is another Value Object with properties "name" and "id") categoryId (of type int) categoryUpdated (of type Boolean) I have a collection of Category Objects in the Model. When I set the categoryId of this class, I set the "categoryUpdated" to true, and dispatch an CairngormEvent to that find the "category" with the specified "categoryId" and set the "category" property to this item. So what is the best practice? To simply make the "categoryId" a public variable, and create a new Event/Command to perform all this logic? Or is it ok to do it all in the Value Object setter? Thanks.

Revision: 3570 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-10 10:08:53 -0700 (Fri, 10 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix for SDK-17109 - Incorrect deprecation text when generating ASDoc for a deprecated AS or MXML class. QA: Yes Doc: Reviewed By: Paul Tests: checkintests Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17109 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/ClassTable.java flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/DocComment.java flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelClassesGenerator.java flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelGenerator.java

I'd like to see "svn diff" used within the submission emails. Even if it cuts off after a certain number of lines, seeing the code that's being submitted would be very useful to get a better idea of what's going on. I also think it'd help newcomers learn bits and pieces of the code. -Brian

Revision: 3540 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-09 11:20:44 -0700 (Thu, 09 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix for missing name of the exception class, when @throw is used. Also fixes for: SDK-17212 - Add a line feed between messages in the ASDoc validation_errors.log file. SDK-17242 - The Constants.as and GlobalFunctions.as classes from system classes need to have their content added to __Global__.xml SDK-17256 - For methods of the mx.components.Group class, args or return values of type Object do not appear in the ASDoc output. QA: Yes Doc: Tests: checkintests Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17212 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17242 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17256 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/class-files.xslt flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/AsDocUtil.java flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/ClassTable.java flex/sdk/trun

Revision: 3528 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-08 17:10:59 -0700 (Wed, 08 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- New Spark skins for Gumbo components. The wireframe skins will be re-packaged into a theme in a future checkin. The default font for all Gumbo components is Arial 12 normal weight. In order to avoid conflict with the default font for Halo components, the Gumbo text styles are defined on three type selectors: FxButton, FxTextBase, and FxTextBox. If you want to change the default font for Gumbo components, you'll need to change it in all three selectors. This is a temporary solution until we have Spark skins for our Halo components. This checkin also includes a workaround for SDK-17222. The workaround is to include a reference to FxHScrollBar and FxVScrollBar in FxTextArea, and a reference to FxScroller in FxList. This is a temporary workaround that will be removed when the bug is fixed. Note: the files in the flex4test project have not been updated for the rename. Th

Hi all,<br /><br />I was trying build a large project off of trunk, and I've run into a<br />few problems. I wanted to check out some of the compiler performance<br />improvements, but it's not critical that I run things off of trunk.<br />(I'll probably try to move a few to the Flex 3 branch instead.) But I<br />wanted to let you know about the issues I had, and see which ones of<br />them I should create bugs on.<br /><br />1. The first error I ran into when compiling was this:<br /><br /> [java] C:\perforce\trunk\ActionBar.mxml(109): Error: Access of<br />undefined property disabledIcon.<br /> [java]<br /> [java] disabledIcon="{itemRepeater.currentItem.disabledIcon}"<br /> [java]<br /> [java] C:\perforce\trunk\ActionBar.mxml(110): Error: Access of<br />undefined property overIcon.<br /> [java]<br /> [java] overIcon="{itemR

I would like to add an async function inside the setUp() of a test, but FlexUnit generates an error to the effect that the function argument is not a function. Is running async function in a setUp() supported? I would appreciate any advice on this. Basically, what I'm trying to do is to perform some end-to-end testing of business methods inside FlexUnit, and those methods need to call methods on the server. Because the methods alter state on the server, I want to be able to clear up any changes to server-side state performed during the tests. Thus, I need to invoke remote methods inside the setUp() methods of a test suite; and I need to ensure that each test case executes only after the setUp() method receives events from the remote method indicating successful return. Again, I'd very much appreciate any suggestions as to how this may be achieved. Thanks, -- Frank

Hi, Using v0.9 I read over the online doc on chaining here: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/communityengine/index.cfm?event=showDetails&postId=6882&productId=2&loc=en_US However I cannot seem to get this to work. a) My outer "test" registers a addAsync function (verifyWriteComplete) to listen for the "success" event of writing a file. This gets called successfully. b) verifyWriteComplete, then calls another function called "readWrittenFile". c) "readWrittenFile" registers and addAsync function "verifyReadComplete" which reads the file written by A above. This verifyReadComplete function IS being called OK (I can see via trace statements). The problem is that the second chained addAsync (C) above in flexunit is still reporting that it was never called within the timeout, despite the fact that it obviously is. The test runner is reporting a failure, even though the verifyReadComplete wrapped in an addAsync was called OK.

Revision: 3480 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-03 13:35:50 -0700 (Fri, 03 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Remove gumbo Panel tags. Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/development/eclipse/flex/flex4test/src/flex4test.mxml

Revision: 3478 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-03 13:34:49 -0700 (Fri, 03 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Remove prototype Gumbo Panel component. This will be reinstated in a future build. Remove the "selected" property from SkinnableComponent. "selected" is only on ToggleButton (including CheckBox/RadioButton), and ItemRenderer. Bugs: SDK-16349 SkinnableComponent shouldn't define "selected" SDK-16799 Gumbo Panel needs to be removed from build QA: Tests using Panel need to be updated Reviewer: Chet Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16349 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16799 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/mxml-2009-manifest.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/defaults.css flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/manifest.xml flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/Flex4Classes.as flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/component/ItemRenderer.as flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/proje

I've read FlexUnit can next TestSuites, but I can't seem to get it to work. I haven't seen any examples of this either, so not sure what I'm doing wrong. What I have so far is a master suite that adds several other suites, all of which add a bunch of TestCases. I'm adding them via addTestSuite(). Any suggestions?

Revision: 3454 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-02 10:06:28 -0700 (Thu, 02 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix bug with public getter for variable name starting with $. QA:Yes Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/AsDocUtil.java

Revision: 3436 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-10-01 06:20:01 -0700 (Wed, 01 Oct 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix for null pointer reported by the doc team. QA: No Doc: No Tests: checkintests Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/ASDocExtension.java

Hey guys, Just want to get your thoughts rather than jump in and filing a feature request. What do you think about moving a few things that aren't necessarily RPC out of mx.rpc and into a new package (for example mx.async) and removing some of the service-related assumptions? A couple of candidates for this in my mind would be: AsyncToken - I use this for all sorts of Async stuff, which is usually waiting on a service, but not always. IResponder - This is useful for things such as command chains, and listening in to user actions, and the like. I would also like to see IResponder.applyFault() and IResponder.applyResult() be taken out of mx_internal (and their parameters changed from event types to something else, perhaps Object for result, and Fault for fault). And the various impls of IResponder as well :) Just an idea that's been bouncing around my head, thought I'd throw it out there and see what you guys think - worth filing a feature request? -Josh -- "Therefore, send

Revision: 3430 Author: gruehle@adobe.com Date: 2008-09-30 16:43:13 -0700 (Tue, 30 Sep 2008) Log Message: ----------- This is a collection of minor component changes, done for consistency. * Data is always "pushed" into skin parts. We were doing this in some places like ItemsComponent.contentGroup, but not in other places. Affected components are TextInput, TextArea, NumericStepper, and Button. * Button (and every subclass) has an optional "labelField" SkinPart. The Button "label" property is pushed into this part if it is defined. * Added skin states to the following components: TrackBase (includes H/VScrollBar and H/VSlider): States "normal" and "disabled". Spinner (includes NumericStepper): States "normal" and "disabled". ContainerBase (includes ItemsComponent, Selector, and List): States "normal" and "disabled". The appearance of "disabled" states is controlled by the skin. The behavior of "disabled" states is still controlled by the component (ie ScrollBar disables the th

Revision: 3425 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-09-30 12:33:24 -0700 (Tue, 30 Sep 2008) Log Message: ----------- revert fix for SDK-17001 made in revision 3319. It breaks asdoc for Bindable properties in as files. QA: Yes Doc: No Tests: checkintests Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17001 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/AsDocAPI.java

Revision: 3422 Author: gauravj@adobe.com Date: 2008-09-30 11:27:36 -0700 (Tue, 30 Sep 2008) Log Message: ----------- Fix for SDK-17106 - Incorrect generated document for generated property from [HostComponent] tag Fix for SDK-17110 - Incorrect link to a custom property from an mxml-generated property document QA: Yes Doc: Java change reviewed by: Paul Tests: checkintests Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17106 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17110 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/templates/class-files.xslt flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/HostComponentEvaluator.java

I've run into a strange behavior with Flex Builder 3 and posted it to my blog: http://devharbor.blogspot.com/2008/09/strange-behavior-in-flex-builder-3.html Someone on the Flex General Forum said that we're being protected from using classes we're not supposed to. Well, for a project where I have to reference the objects inside a DataGrid itemRenderer, I needed to create a variable of type ListBaseContentHolder. Anyone know the reasoning behind this "hiding" behavior of some classes? Any way to "unhide" these classes? Thanks. Sincerely, Alex Cougarman Serving as Institute Coordinator   for the Triangle Cluster Louis G. Gregory Baha'i Institute 919-906-9929 (cell/home) 919-549-7823 (work) cougarman@gmail.com