Skip to main content
Known Participant
January 19, 2025
Question

Why should Adobe subscriber wait for asset creator to release copyright claims ?

  • January 19, 2025
  • 1 reply
  • 563 views

Adobe needs to Automate its Asset/Stock Credit Claims, And if Adobe refuses to do it then some other AI will anyway sort this issue and hope that day comes sooner than before. 

1. When a subscriber of Adobe use a Stock/ Asset included in its premium plans, then the Stock / Asset Creator of a background sound takes at times 48 hours to clear the copyright on Youtube. YT blocks the video and by the time dispute is cleared I have observed videos to have limited reach (may be due to YT algo). I blame Adobe for this squarely. 

 

2. What value does this bring to become a Adobe Subscriber.  Adobe Express markets itself to help creators, but this multi billion earning company does not think from the pov of its users. 

 

1 reply

Glenn 8675309
Legend
January 19, 2025

Big part of your problem is that you seem to put all of your "eggs into one basket."--- Inside your "toolbox" you should have multiple production streams-- Photoshop, DAZ  3D, Pexels, Canva- and you appear to just use AE. 

ravi_2912Author
Known Participant
January 20, 2025

Nope, you did not get my main problem with Adobe's lack of approach to use of licensed sounds on YT. 

1. Using Canva with AE for short videos is waste of money &  impede a simple workflow and defeats the purpose of AE for quick 1 stop shop for creating short social media content.

2. Photoshop , Pexels I am not aware they have template background score. 

I lay all the blame fo this on Adobe & its their duty to figure this out, not pass on the buck to YouTube.

I can think of some solutions like using a Adobe subscriber specific prefix or suffix in combination with ASLC they generate and user puts it into YT while user uploads and its cleared by YT at the very time of  upload, ( via a checkup of the license at the backend in real time by YT). But that would mean Adobe to work for ease of use with YouTube and they should.

YT may charge them for it and given Adobe is making so much money at the back of subscribers, they should do it. 

David__B
Adobe Employee
Adobe Employee
January 23, 2025

Hi @ravi_2912

Sorry to hear about your difficulties with this. I was also curious how many times you had issues with copyright claims from YouTube. I've seen a few other customer reports about this but am unsure how prevalent the issue is. 

I'll pass on your feedback and ideas to our developers.

Thanks,
Dave