hey yall, im reading reading the documentation and is this a typo?
im a bit confused, never used functions but i always thought they were more complex threfore less abstracted, can someone help me understand?
Hello @metaphysicalwurb,
Thank you for flagging this! Indeed this can be interpreted in more ways than one. The documentation of function graphs needs to be refreshed entirely, with more actionable information, clearer links to Substance graphs, and more examples. This includes dedicated sections to Pixel Processor, FX-Maps and parameter functions.
It is a significant endeavour, and in the meantime only incorrect information or obvious typos will be fixed.
Thank you for your patience!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
AdChoices