is this a type or am i mistaken?

Question

hey yall, im reading reading the documentation and is this a typo?
im a bit confused, never used functions but i always thought they were more complex threfore less abstracted, can someone help me understand?

Luca Giarrizzo · Accepted Answer

Hello @metaphysicalwurb,

Thank you for flagging this! Indeed this can be interpreted in more ways than one. The documentation of function graphs needs to be refreshed entirely, with more actionable information, clearer links to Substance graphs, and more examples. This includes dedicated sections to Pixel Processor, FX-Maps and parameter functions.

It is a significant endeavour, and in the meantime only incorrect information or obvious typos will be fixed.

Thank you for your patience!

metaphysicalwurb · Answer

i think i understand now its not a typo, but idk if im correct, its hugher in abstraction cuz theyre used to modify parameters cammong off of graphs, correct? idk what i had in mind really

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.