are more efficient the vst or vst3?

Forum|Forum|8 years ago
July 16, 2017
2 replies
2285 views

hi

just a question are more efficient the vst or vst3 plugins?

i have read about vst vs vst3 , for somebody vst3 are less stable but they have advantages (can work 64&32bit)

may i know your experience with audition cc ?

thanks

This topic has been closed for replies.

Paul_Ferguson

Inspiring

My experience is that VST3 plugins don't require any management inside Audition Plugin Manager - they load automatically. By contrast, I have to direct Plugin Manager to the folder(s) containing all my VST plugins. Not a big deal, but for me, VST3 is more convenient.

Bob Howes

Inspiring

Maybe not helpful but I have some VST plug ins and a smaller number of VST3 ones. Based on a very small sample I can't notice any difference in terms of speed of loading and operation or reliability.

ryclark

Participating Frequently

For more info on improvements of VST3 over the original VST spec why not look on the inventors of VST, Steinbergs site.

https://www.steinberg.net/en/company/technologies/vst3.html

JohnVoAuthor

Inspiring

Hi Ryclark

yes thanks for the link I have read before posting here

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded