Skip to main content
A
AudioAesthetics
Participant
January 14, 2020
Answered

Plugins in Effects Rack to transform your waveform in Multitrack view. How?

  • January 14, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 607 views

Hello!

When I apply any plugin directly (not through ER) - the waveform changes visually. But if I apply anything through Effects Rack in Multitrack view - the waveform stays the same all the time. Is there any way to make it transform by adding plugins on the Rack? It really helps me if the audio visualized...

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer SteveG_AudioMasters_

No, you won't be able to do that. If you tried to do it, the extra processing burden would be prohibitative. I mean, it might be okay for one track, but by the time you'd applied the same principle to 64 tracks in a mix, it would be a different matter completely. All these things are processor-intensive, and most people would rather have the audio performance. I certainly would.

1 reply

SteveG_AudioMasters_
Community Expert
SteveG_AudioMasters_Community Expert
Community Expert
January 14, 2020

The effects rack behaves exactly the same way a single effect does - if you hit Apply on a rackfull of effects, you'll see the changes, just as you do with a single effect.

    A
    AudioAestheticsAuthor
    Participant
    January 14, 2020

    Thanks for your reply, SteveG and sorry, little correction: I'm working in a Multitrack view and I'm using effects rack exactly in the Multitrack view and I can't see any Apply button on the rack there. Is there any way to see the changes visually on the tracks in this view?

    SteveG_AudioMasters_
    Community Expert
    SteveG_AudioMasters_Community ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    January 14, 2020

    No, you won't be able to do that. If you tried to do it, the extra processing burden would be prohibitative. I mean, it might be okay for one track, but by the time you'd applied the same principle to 64 tracks in a mix, it would be a different matter completely. All these things are processor-intensive, and most people would rather have the audio performance. I certainly would.

      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices