Skip to main content
C
Christo @ MSN
Known Participant
June 23, 2020
Question

SCORM Multipackager

  • June 23, 2020
  • 1 reply
  • 381 views

I'm attempting to publish a multiscorm package, that requires the user to proceed in order.  The individual SCORM zips are entered in the order they should be taken.  (I'm using SCORM 1.2 standard).  When I click Multiple SCOs template for version 1.2, I do not see the "Force Module Sequence" checkbox.   Simple Remediation and Pre-test or Post-test seems to require SCORM 2004.  I thought I have been able to force module sequence in SCORM 1.2 projects before.  Has this changed?  Do I have to republish to SCORM 2004 in order to force sequence?

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    1 reply

    Stagprime2687219
    Stagprime2687219
    Legend
    June 23, 2020

    First - my apologies that my response does not directly answer your question but is instead, a related thought.

     

    My response is this...

    I am able to force the sequence of modules for the learner through my LMS.

    The next module unlocks when the prior one is completed.

    Are you using an LMS? If so, do you know if that is a supported function of the LMS?

      C
      Christo @ MSNAuthor
      Known Participant
      June 23, 2020

      Our LMS may be capable of forcing sequence, but I believe it gets this through the manifest, which has the SCO's in the correct order.  However, when the user accesses the published course the order is different from what I published.

      Stagprime2687219
      Stagprime2687219
      Legend
      June 23, 2020

      I suppose one difference may be that when I set this sort of thing up - I am publishing and uploading the content packages separately to the LMS. When I build a course with them - that is when I place them in the order I want them to go through. I can then place completion criteria on the module and force the sequence to be ordered.

      So - in that sense, there is no sequencing based on the manifest in my case.

       

      I don't know if that is a worthwhile avenue to investigate for you or not.

       

      Perhaps someone else can weigh in more about the multipackaging part - I have never used it myself.

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices