Is it really so complicated?
Some of us have taken part in the following discussion -
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2279932
Which has caused me to re-look at web development, this forum, and Dw in particular.
Dw has I think lost touch, and any solutions we offer users would I think be better if they were not Dw related, but composed of components, and snippets of code, that the user could use in any program. Why?
The only 'complete' solution that Dw offers is bootstrap, and this will cause problems for users if Dw ever updates to bootstrap v4. as it is not really backwards compatible is it. This leaves users such as the OP of the above discussion in limbo to some extent, as any site they create now will in 1 or 2 years time not be editable in Dw, (if Dw does update to v4, but if it does not, what then?).
I also looked at the swap-image behaviour, and the image size problem mentioned in the last few posts of the discussion, (don't scream, I will be mentioning srcset
). It was then I realized that anyone now using just what Dw has to offer is -
- Using completely outdated javascript solutions
- Has no way to use modern css to solve a problem
- Cannot use srcset, (with the sizes attribute) to solve the problem of using different images for various viewport sizes)
If this forum is to continue, it must once again move its focus back to code, and away from mainly Dw solutions to web design and development. This would be in order to offer a more widely based offering to modern web development problems. I don't think we can simply say Dw offers x, y, z, and that is what we should offer users, it is simply not working for many who post questions here anymore.
Also one never knows, maybe DW will move to being a post IE8 web tool, if more users learn what is possible without using 'click to insert' solutions.
Finally -
Though I see no reason not to have a visual side to Dw, it must not become a bad solution as its current reputation, (deserved or otherwise) suggests.
