Skip to main content
anthonyb78960445
Participant
May 9, 2017
Question

Drag and Drop graphics from Adobe Bridge into Framemaker 2017

  • May 9, 2017
  • 3 replies
  • 458 views

Hello, we have recently upgraded to Frammaker 2017 from Framemaker 10. In Frame 10 you were able to drag and drop graphics directly from Adobe Bridge and have them "Import by Copy" into an anchored frame. With Frame 2017 the graphic only comes across as "Import by Reference".

Is there a setting that can be changed to have the graphic "Import by Copy" using the drag and drop method from Bridge?

When doing many graphics, it's a bit long winded going through the File-Import-Graphic and then select the file and remember to check the "Import by Copy" check box each time.

This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

anthonyb78960445
Participant
May 10, 2017

Thanks for the replies guys.

I do understand it's not best practices.

We are working towards having a CMS implemented.

As for now we need to continue with what we are doing.

So, I guess if there is no setting to make the drag and drop method go in as "Import by Copy", we'll just have to go the long way round via File-Import method.

Cheers.

Matt-Tech Comm Tools
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 12, 2017

When you say Import by Copy, do you mean Copy into Document, or Import by Reference?

Regardless, in Fm 2017 you have two new features:

-Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
TomSchenck
Inspiring
May 9, 2017

I've been asking for that change for a few years now and am happy that it's finally happened. Just curious, Why do you prefer "Import by Copy?"

Jeff_Coatsworth
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 9, 2017

Not sure if there's a flag for that but Import by Copy isn't "best practices" these days as it bloats your files.

Bob_Niland
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 9, 2017

re: Not sure if there's a flag for that but Import by Copy isn't "best practices" these days as it bloats your files.

It's never been sound stewardship. In addition to bloat:

  • There's no record of what the source object was or where it came from.
  • There's no record of the date (revision) of the object.
  • A corruption elsewhere in the document, eve one that might be mitigated by MIF wash, can cause multiple import-by-copy objects to become unrecoverable gray boxes.
  • No real control over efficient object size (resolution in the case or raster objects).
  • No obvious control over whether aspect ratio has been distorted.
  • No optimization of the color model used.

Any entity that generates illustrated documents needs to have a managed repository for imported objects, a policy for preferred graphics file formats, and specific guidelines for vector/raster, and compression by subject matter.

A policy of drag'n'drop, OLE or import-by-copy amounts to no policy.