Skip to main content
vinayakrishnabhat
vinayakrishnabhat
Inspiring
December 18, 2017
Answered

Image importing by copy into document

  • December 18, 2017
  • 2 replies
  • 1370 views

Hello all,

May be I am missing something very basic here. But I am confused on the procedure of importing an image into FM by copying into document.

Whenever I am importing an image, a pop-up window prompting for graphic scaling is shown. My first doubt is to choose which option in this?

After reading through some of the posts, I started to keep the DPI 72 DPI and always used to keep the scaling in obeject properties 100%. But, at first, I didnt realize that the DPI and scaling are interdependent. So, after closing the FM file, when I re-open this, the scaling and the DPI were changed automatically!! Dont know how and why??? Is this any internal mechanism by which FM is auto adjusting itself the object properties or is it a bug?

But, if I import the image by reference, the DPI setting window won't appear at all. So, is this setting automatic when it comes to image import by reference?

I am not even sure whether I am following correct procedure here... Any help/ link to any other posts where this has been correctly addressed would be appreciable.

Additional query: Which image format is best to use in user guide (PDF) and Webhelp (HTML responsive)?? Please help me out in this regard.

Thanks in advance,

Vinayakrishna

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Matt-Tech Comm Tools

Very important: Do not use JPEG/JPG for screen captures.

The compression applied to JPG is what is making your images blurry.

I have had great success with all of these techniques

  • Save as BMP (larger file size)
  • Save as PNG (probably the favorite among Snagit and RoboScreenCapture* users)
  • Paste screenshots directly into FrameMaker from clipboard

While the last option (pasting directly to FrameMaker) is likely going to invite a few comments here, it is far and away my recommended approach for screen captures. My books have hundreds of these captures, and they print without loss of quality, and do not slow down page display in Fm. Size of screen captures is related to the view size of your doc when pasting. For me, viewing my doc at 160% when pasting gives a consistent legible size to the images.

*Remember, RoboScreenCapture is included with FrameMaker

2 replies

Matt-Tech Comm Tools
Community Expert
Matt-Tech Comm ToolsCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
December 19, 2017

Very important: Do not use JPEG/JPG for screen captures.

The compression applied to JPG is what is making your images blurry.

I have had great success with all of these techniques

  • Save as BMP (larger file size)
  • Save as PNG (probably the favorite among Snagit and RoboScreenCapture* users)
  • Paste screenshots directly into FrameMaker from clipboard

While the last option (pasting directly to FrameMaker) is likely going to invite a few comments here, it is far and away my recommended approach for screen captures. My books have hundreds of these captures, and they print without loss of quality, and do not slow down page display in Fm. Size of screen captures is related to the view size of your doc when pasting. For me, viewing my doc at 160% when pasting gives a consistent legible size to the images.

*Remember, RoboScreenCapture is included with FrameMaker

-Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
    S
    Community Manager
    Stefan GentzCommunity Manager
    Community Manager
    December 19, 2017

    I was just going to start complaining, but then read your "While the last option (pasting directly to FrameMaker) is likely going to invite a few comments here" … :-)

    That said, let me throw in some arguments, why you should not do it:

    1. It blows up your documents.
    2. It makes maintaining images MUCH more complicated.
    3. It does not work in XML-based scenarios.
    4. It's a total pain when you plan to get your documents translated and will need to replace screenshots with ones from the localized software.
      Matt-Tech Comm Tools
      Community Expert
      Matt-Tech Comm ToolsCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      December 19, 2017

      Hi Stefan, and apologies to Vinayakrishna, as we're starting to hijack his thread!

      I wish this were an easier topic to nail down, but for this entire topic, the answer is generally "It depends..."

      There is no one-size-fits-all image handling advice, so all of this is meant as an academic discussion...

      I believe each should evaluate their own workflow and make their own decisions based on (among other factors)

      • hardware
      • software
      • publishing experience

      Here are my questions related to your list:

      1. When you say "It blows up your documents" what do you mean?  In my experience, when pasting from the clipboard, the .fm size is optimized, the images don't degrade scrolling speed, and my docs don't crash.

      2. Why do you think it makes maintaining images more complicated? In my experience, when a screenshot needs modifying, a file saved to disk is generally not of much use. A new screenshot is required. Also, in my experience, screenshots don't have a high level of reuse. I would submit that the time spent processing, saving, and managing single use screenshots far outweighs the benefit of saving screenshots to disk and modifying/reusing them. Put another way, I think maintaining a library of screenshots is MUCH more complicated.

      3. True, for XML (or other structured docs) pasting the image from the clipboard will create invalid structure. Invalid structure is never a good thing, and for structured workflows, I retract this method!!!!!

      4. Do you expect the localization to occur on the original images via Photoshop? If not, what's the difference between managing the images placed in the doc versus managing nested folders of saved images? Either way, the localizer will need to reproduce the context of the screenshot and reshoot.

      -Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
        Matt-Tech Comm Tools
        Community Expert
        Matt-Tech Comm ToolsCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        December 18, 2017

        Before answering, can you tell me which version of FrameMaker you are using? The dialogs and behaviors have changed in Fm 2017, so knowing your version will help provide context.

        -Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
          vinayakrishnabhat
          vinayakrishnabhatAuthor
          Inspiring
          December 18, 2017

          Hello Matt,

          Thanks for the reply. I use framemaker 2017 version.

          Regards,

          Vinayakrishna

          Matt-Tech Comm Tools
          Community Expert
          Matt-Tech Comm ToolsCommunity Expert
          Community Expert
          December 18, 2017

          Excellent!

          In 2017 you have new image insert functionality.

          The fourth of the new feature videos I created is for this feature.

          Get access to all 10 videos at FrameMaker 2017 New Feature Videos - Tech Comm Tools and let me know if this clears up your insertion dialog question.

          Regarding the format for PDF v. online help:

          Vector graphics should use a format like Illustrator AI, PDF, or EPS

          Bitmap graphics have more options.

          Can you further describe the images you are placing?

          -Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
            Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
            Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices