Answered
PDFL fails in FM-15 - just a statistic
We all do know that the generation of PDF with PDFL in FM-15 (aka 2019) is not that reliable. But I wanted to support this by a short statistik spanning the last 13 months.
| Month | Docs | OK | NOK | Books | OK | NOK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2021-01 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2021-02 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
2021-03 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
|
2021-04 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
2021-05 |
13 |
10 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
|
2021-06 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
2021-07 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
2021-08 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
|
2021-09 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2021-10 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
2021-11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
2021-12 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
2022-01 |
33 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
NOK means that the process failed and FM quit' You see, that the geneation of a PDF for a book failes more often than for single documents.
Now my question: Is it really reliable in FM-16 (aka 2020)?
AdChoices