Skip to main content
Chris  P.  Bacon
Inspiring
December 7, 2022
Question

Does the color picker account for the isolation mode color overlay?

  • December 7, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 1425 views

When I use the color picker tool to select a color for my selected text, there is a "faded" overlay on the picture, because selecting my text brings me into isolation mode because my text is in a group because it's created with envelope distort, and isolation mode has a color overlay on the image.

Does the color picker tool account for the isolation color overlay or doesn't?

If it does, then I am not picking the correct color (1) for my text (2).

And if it does, how do I pick the correct color?

Do I need to pick the color first and then enter isolation mode?

 

2 replies

Mike_Gondek10189183
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 9, 2022

Yes do not isolate if you want a closer color.

 

If you are really looking for 100% accurate color then sample in photoshop with a 1-pixel eyedropper.

For example fill a photoshop.PSD in CMYK mode with 50CMY. Place in Illustrator document color mode of CMYK  and sample, you will get a different color. This is very important if you have for example an illustrator vector  fill touching that color in a placed image. 

 

In older versions of Illustrator  shift  eyedropper acted differently to sample without RGB conversion, but they changed that about 3 years ago, and holding down shift does not make a difference anymore.  

 

 

Doug A Roberts
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2022

It shouldn't. Are you finding that it does?

Chris  P.  Bacon
Inspiring
December 7, 2022

It does unfortunately, I tested it with the color of the lake (that's a uniform color fill that I use as text background).

It would be nice if it wouldn't, but I guess the best solution is to disable the color overlay of the isolation mode.

How do I disable it?

 

 

Doug A Roberts
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2022

Isolation mode seems to have no effect on the eyedropper selection, unless we're talking about different things: