Generative Fill being hyper-sensitive?

Yes, this is super frustrating. As a company we work in retouching business and we are currently retouching underwear campaign. I cant even remove creases off the underwear at the moment, results simply dont generate. People on photos are not naked, they are wearing underwear, bra's and pants, but this seems to be an issue now. So how we as a business suppose to use Adobe now?

I had a partial image of a bodybuilder who's elbows were cut off and needed them filled in. Sure he's a good looking lad where the photo was cut off mid torso. He's not nude but he's also not wearing a shirt. Gasp. The prudes are already shrinking. Photoshop said it violated the sensitivity clause and rejected the notion I wanted it to add elbows. Elbow. Not an erect p**** or a va**** . An elbow. Even after I blacked out the torso it still refused. So no to provoke all mighty Adobe's woke sensitive delicate feewings, I used the Content Aware fill with a rough outline of an elbow and did a work around. Adobe you gotta fix your issues. This is stupid.

I think its honestly silly. You have to be 18 or older to use AI gen, why censor results that are adult oriented in the first place? Last time I checked photoshop is supposed to be a professional tool used by professionals and believe it or not there is professional photography that involves swimsuits, lingerie, nudity, etc.

If you have to be 18 to use it why does it act like its PG/PG13? Do you think people over the age of 18 can't handle a little smoke, or a swimsuit top, or nudity? And if you do, give us an option to say "allow X".

The words you're looking for are: "Hyper Censored"

I think I might have noticed a change in how Gen Fill is working.  I used to tell people to temporarily hide the potentially contentious area, use Gen Fill and turn the problem pixels back on again, but the last few times I have tried that trick, it no longer worked.  Could it be looking at turned off layers or behind masks?

it is AI and it sort of has a mind of its own and will move in different directions over time. 

I'm making fashion images and NO SPEEDOS except like once randomly in a blue moon. 

Which is a real bummer because when they first released FireFly it was what art should be. Throwing dudes in dresses and heels -- not like you needed to use the image. But there has definitely been a shift that they are in some way influencing, even as AI shifts on it's own. 

It is really frustraiting. 

Sometimes I have to litereally write out a gay sob story to play into the stereotype and it'll generate "gay" things — which, a speedo is not, I mean there were more straight men on the beach with speedos last year than the year before and so on — and like other countries. And even shorts like litereally normal shorts, especially for a fashion lookbook are a 5-7" inseam but it refuses to put shorts over the dudes knee which is like 90s and I just get to angry because WHO is this helping and protecting and when did ART become this. I've been experimenting using OpenSource and, it is okay I mean you get what you want but like, it is so literal. I miss when Adobe wasn't crazy ... like 5 years ago? I've been using it for a decade at least. I stopped paying twice and they give a free month because like the creative process they force is the opposite of flow and ugh I could go on for hours I am just so dissapointed in them. Particuarly like, they *could* know who is doing what. I'd be happy to share my projects. There are a million other solutions and they just half their censorship, it's just.. I mean they have been all around disappointing to the max since AI. Once I master the learning curve for Stable Diffusion, which seems more about finding a model to download with it, I'm so out. 

[abuse removed by moderator]

Same here. I had both apps opened simultaneously and Beta blocked most of the prompts but photoshop allowed them. 

Will there ever be a time when you can turn off community guidelines for the private use of the software you're continuously paying for?

Having to convince Photoshop that I'm not making explicit content is pretty frustrating.

And for that matter, why is there a nudity/blood/weapons/violence policing of my software in the first place?

If the image generated isn't what Adobe wants in their source pool, don't save it.

As a final insult, I wasn't allowed to post this question without first removing the 4 letter p.word which refers to explicit nudity... Just... really?

"Swimsuit", honestly. I can understand why Adobe is sensitive with that prompt - fine. But the applications seem inconsistent. I got the top three to work - even one with an exposed midriff, but the last one it didn't want to do anything. And that's what I find frustrating - I have no idea when it'll work and when it won't. I get the same problem with reference images - sometimes bikinis are fine, sometimes they're not. Sometimes one-pieces are fine, and sometimes they're not. Again, I can understand why Adobe is being sensitive - fine. But I want consistency. (I blacked out the person's face since they were photos from an event; the first two are from stock pictures).

Can you share some examples of prompts that failed?