Generative fill is terrible

Still the same, this is two years after your post, and I paid for Photoshop only to use that generative feature, and it just didn't work! I say rock, it gives me FEET!!!!

I feel like generative fill has gotten worse. When I first started using it, it was actually producing usable things. But now I can't even get it to fill a basic color. I don't know what they started doing. I have nothing but bad things to say about Adobe products

I only ever use generative fill to remove things. But I must agree, even for that simple and basic purpose, it is generally awful. Occasionally it works perfectly, but I'm astounded that, for example, if I remove something from a tile floor, the tile floor it replaces it with is often a darker color, or sometimes it will add some random alien object onto the floor, or the tile paterns are way off or entirely missing. You would think something as simple as that would be easy for it to do. Same thing with carpet. When removing an object from carpet, the carpet it replaces it with, again, is often a different shade of color, and almost always, the carpet looks extremely degraded and very low resolution. When I "enhance detail" it almost invariably looks even worse. Can it not be trained to sample the actual surface it's trying to reproduce and make a perfect replica - color, texture, patterns?

it is still too much bas. deformed and blured shapes

1.5 years later its still totally useless.
Adobe stopped being an design company years ago. It's a stock vehicle now.
Corporate sell outs training their AI on you and charging you for the privilege.

I must agree, it's good for landscapes, but nothing much else. The human & animal generations are gruesome. A lot of the extended generations leave much to be desired. But, the worst by far are human faces and limbs. Utterly vile. One evening I did over 60 generations and not a single face was like a human. Even zombies would run away from them. I thought this would be fabulous 18 months ago, but in reality, it gets worse every update. 

It's actually shocking that they are charging extra for this feature in the form of credits.  It's absolutely ridiculous.  Does Adobe even have a business plan or is everyone in the company improvising every day? 

Yeah it's embarrasingly bad. Feels like they're ripping us off (again and again)

Generative fill is utter garbage. a waste of time to even try to use, beyond, " make a colorful background" and even then it's hit and miss. Unbelievable a company of this size could release something so useless.

Indeed, now that the generative fill feature is accessible to the public, there hasn't been notable enhancement. I'd suggest considering alternative AI image generation tools and employing photo manipulation methods as alternatives. It seems Photoshop hasn't quite lived up to expectations in the AI domain. Let's hope for better developments in the future.