Skip to main content
bartonlew
Legend
February 21, 2018
Answered

panorama workflow using PS, LR and Camera Raw

  • February 21, 2018
  • 3 replies
  • 1342 views

I have a question about the workflow for creating and editing panoramas – specifically whether Lightroom or Photoshop is a better place to create and perfect them.  I wonder if the following is a good workflow but would appreciate hearing back if others disagree:

  1. create panorama in Lightroom so you can do color correction etc. in the resultant Raw file as opposed to Photoshop which doesn’t give you a Raw file to work with  for the assembled image;
  2. Do color correction etc. in Camera Raw as opposed to Lightroom for better control (specifically, I like seeing where shadows and highlights are clipped in Camera Raw by clicking on the upper triangles in the histogram – can’t do that in LR);
  3. After editing in Camera Raw, open into Photoshop for any other repairs as needed.

However, I also wonder if Photohsop does a better job creating panoramas than Lightroom, so maybe it is the best place to create panoramas, especially if you have a project that involves them exclusively and you have a lot of them.  Thank you.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Conrad_C

The more you look at this question, the more you'll realize there isn't one clear-cut answer. Sometimes Lightroom/Adobe Camera Raw is a better solution, sometimes Photomerge in Photoshop is better.

This article compares Lightroom/ACR and Photoshop panorama workflows (disclaimer: I'm the author):

Creating a Panorama: Photoshop, Camera Raw, or Lightroom? Multiple solutions give you more options

Despite the advantage that Lightroom and ACR have in merging to DNG, there are some image sets that just don't work right in Lightroom/ACR, but Photoshop handles them no problem. In that case, it's good that they use different stitching methods, so that one might work when the other one fails.

I do as much of the panorama color correction as possible as DNG in Lightroom, because practically all the controls are the same as Camera Raw, right down to those highlight and shadow clipping indicators.

There are also situations where you'll take a DNG panorama into Photoshop just to use the Adaptive Wide Angle filter, which is able to remove some types of panorama distortion more effectively than anything available in Lightroom/Camera Raw.

3 replies

Conrad_C
Community Expert
Conrad_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 22, 2018

The more you look at this question, the more you'll realize there isn't one clear-cut answer. Sometimes Lightroom/Adobe Camera Raw is a better solution, sometimes Photomerge in Photoshop is better.

This article compares Lightroom/ACR and Photoshop panorama workflows (disclaimer: I'm the author):

Creating a Panorama: Photoshop, Camera Raw, or Lightroom? Multiple solutions give you more options

Despite the advantage that Lightroom and ACR have in merging to DNG, there are some image sets that just don't work right in Lightroom/ACR, but Photoshop handles them no problem. In that case, it's good that they use different stitching methods, so that one might work when the other one fails.

I do as much of the panorama color correction as possible as DNG in Lightroom, because practically all the controls are the same as Camera Raw, right down to those highlight and shadow clipping indicators.

There are also situations where you'll take a DNG panorama into Photoshop just to use the Adaptive Wide Angle filter, which is able to remove some types of panorama distortion more effectively than anything available in Lightroom/Camera Raw.

davescm
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 21, 2018

Try both

Lightroom does a great job of stitching and gives you the result in a DNG file. It also enables you to choose and preview the projection and warp the boundary with the boundary warp slider

bartonlew  wrote

, I like seeing where shadows and highlights are clipped in Camera Raw by clicking on the upper triangles in the histogram – can’t do that in LR);

Of course you can do that in Lightroom, either with the arrows or by holding Alt whilst moving the Whites/Blacks sliders :

Dave

bartonlew
bartonlewAuthor
Legend
February 22, 2018

Thanks, but I am not getting those arrows in the upper corners of the Histogram like you are.  I don't see them and when I click there nothing happens.

JJMack
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 21, 2018

I would think that best place would be is a program  designed for stitching images.  Those programs would have better stitching and features designed for improving the piano projection being assembled.

Your statement about Photoshop is incorrect. ACR creates DGN stitched panorama files.

Since ACR can ]stitch images and Lightroom uses the same adobe raw conversion engine as Photoshop I would think  Photoshop and Lightroom stitching results would be quite  similar.  However, Photoshop Supports layers and has a 3D feature that can import a 360 spherical panorama as a 3d layer and rotate the  panorama in 3D space and would be able to do a better job than Lightroom correcting the sky and earth because rotated there would less distortion in the area you are working on.    I do not use Lightroom so I actually do not know how well it can patch up problem areas in panorama.  If you install both Lightroom and Photoshop you may want to use both.  After all you installed both.

JJMack