Skip to main content
Fetih
Known Participant
October 13, 2023
Question

Photoshop LZW colors and sharpness

  • October 13, 2023
  • 2 replies
  • 973 views

Hello, I do digital printing on textiles. It is important for us that the colors we work with are clear and that the colors remain the same after printing. If we save the files with LZW, will we have color and clarity problems in printing?
Changing even a single tone will cause the color to appear different.

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

Derek Cross
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 13, 2023

Are you using Screen printing and, if so, are they spot colours or CMYK?

Fetih
FetihAuthor
Known Participant
October 17, 2023

Digital printing, paper to fabric printing. RGB profile

Derek Cross
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 17, 2023

Sounds like you should be employing normal colour management workflows including calibrating your monitor, using appropriate profiles for your printer and so on.

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 13, 2023

LZW is lossless, so if you are currently successfully saving uncompressed TIFF files, then LZW shouldn't change that.

Fetih
FetihAuthor
Known Participant
October 17, 2023

Why doesn't compression without distorting any pixels and tones feel right to me?

What does it reduce without reducing the size of the image and colors?

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 17, 2023
quote

Why doesn't compression without distorting any pixels and tones feel right to me?

What does it reduce without reducing the size of the image and colors?


By @Fetih

 

Perhaps it doesn't feel right to you because you don't understand lossless compression and perhaps only know of lossy compression such as JPEG.

 

There are different ways of encoding data, which may (or may not) make a file smaller in file size. Generally, the trade-off is in slower saving times than with uncompressed data.

 

Imagine the following fictitious example:

 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 15

 

vs

 

1-8, 10, 15

 

Nothing has been lost, both methods express the concept of the numbers 1 through to 8, however, the second is "more efficient" as it takes up less "space" than the other (but needs encoding and decoding to restore the missing range of digits from 2 to 7).

 

The easiest one to learn about is RLE:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run-length_encoding

 

I'm not going to even try to explain lossless LZW or ZIP compression, you can read up on that yourself:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lempel%E2%80%93Ziv%E2%80%93Welch

 

https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/LZW-compression