Skip to main content
Known Participant
June 9, 2020
Question

Resizing functionality in PS (2020)

  • June 9, 2020
  • 3 replies
  • 1230 views

I’ve two questions regarding resizing images in PS. 


I need to recover a number of pictures that I deleted in LightRoom; I have the thumbnails of these, created when I imported them into LR. 

If I resize these in PS, what image quality would I get? 

Some sources inform me, a thumbnail does not have enough information, and resizing it will not bring back the original image quality. I that is the case, how much quality could I recover by resizing them.

 

I resized in PS several images already; I noticed when I uploaded in PS, the image resize function revealed the image was 3.4MB in size. Apple’s Finder info revealed it was only 72Kb. 

 

In PS, I only changed the resolution to 300 ppi; automatically, the width and height were changed. At that point, the dialog informed me the size of the image was now 64MB. I saved the image. Finder informed the resized image was 3.4MB. 

I wonder why is the reported size so different in PS and Apple. 


I appreciate any comments you might have on these questions. 

FYI: Adobe CC subscriber; PS, LR CC, and MAC OS all updated to their latest versions. 

 

This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

rivalgAuthor
Known Participant
June 14, 2020

Conrad,

 

My belated thanks for your reply. 

 

Your answer helped me understand the diference. 

 

r.

Conrad_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 9, 2020

rivalg wrote:

I wonder why is the reported size so different in PS and Apple. 

 

Photoshop reports the true uncompressed file size of an image; in other words, the data size that results from doing the math on, for example, bits per pixel * the number of pixels * the number of channels. That is usually a much larger number than what you see on the desktop, because…

 

The Mac Finder (or Windows Explorer) desktop reports the size of the file resulting from both the file format and the amount of compression. This is the reason we don’t compare “quality” using file size: The same 300 x 200 pixel image could have several very different file sizes on the desktop depending on which file format they were saved in (JPEG? PSD? TIFF?), the bits per channel of the file (8? 16? 32?), whether high or low compression was used, etc. So file size is an extremely unreliable way to compare image quality. Much better to compare using pixel dimensions (e.g., 300 x 200 px vs 3000 x 2000 px).

 

If you want more details about that, you can read the following article (disclaimer: I wrote it):

Know Your Photoshop File Sizes

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 9, 2020

This is all about pixels. Watch the pixels. Forget ppi or file size on disk.

 

An image is measured in how many pixels. Increasing pixel size will bloat file size, but do nothing for quality. On the contrary, the result will usually look a whole lot worse. Don't do it, don't even think about it.

 

The jpeg file format uses very aggressive data compression to reduce storage size on disk. It's just packaging on disk. When the file is reopened, the data are decompressed and the file size returns. Hence the apparent difference (which isn't real).

 

Lots of people misunderstand ppi. It's not a native property of the file. It's an instruction about pixel density in print, determining how big the available pixels will print on paper. It's still just pixels. To help understand, read it absolutely literally, word for word: pixels per inch. It means exactly what it says, no more, no less.

rivalgAuthor
Known Participant
June 9, 2020

Thank you for your reply.

 

I am still one of those people who misunderstands ppi.

 

Maybe I should have asked: when using the resizing function in PS to enlarge an image, what does the user accomplish? Does the user gets just a bloated image? 

Bojan Živković11378569
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 9, 2020

It depends how much you are upscaling image. Photoshop can handle well up to 100-300% enlargement. With huge upscaling image quality will start to degrade. Another important aspect is current image dimensions and quality. If you have good quality 3000x2000px image to start with you may be satisifed with 100% upscaling. On other side if you try to heavily upscale 300x200px thumbnail which is optimized for web, that will probably result in frustration.