Skip to main content
Inspiring
August 29, 2017
Question

resizing large scale

  • August 29, 2017
  • 2 replies
  • 780 views

hello,

I am working with a client who requires some images to go from 36"x 24" up to 8ft x 10ft.

Usually I don't deal with extreme enlargements and so I wondering what is the best way to attack this?

Im not a straight forward resize in ps will create the best results??

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

Legend
August 30, 2017

The math doesn't quite add up as mentioned but lets's assume you're working towards an 8x10 final image.

Depending on the original image quality, hopefully, it's something in the realms of 8000 pixels width, anything smaller will of course cause the image to pixelate more, regardless it will be somewhat pixelated anyway as your clients will walk right up to it as you mentioned. keep your PPI high and any over text on I would create as vectors in Illustrator so they can scale with no problems.

keep your PPI high and any over text on It  I would create as vectors in Illustrator so they can scale with no problems.

it would seem the only way you're going to do this is as you already mentioned; which is scaling the image up, cleaning and smoothing out what you can.

I would say if the image is any less than 6,000 pixels width then you'll need to ask your clients to reconsider the canvas size or re-take the photo.

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 29, 2017

You just set the required dimensions without "resample image" checked.

You normally don't resize, partly because it doesn't do anything for final quality, and partly because large banners are seen from much farther away. The optical resolution thus stays the same whatever the physical print size.

IOW the bigger it is, the lower the ppi. Same optical result.

Naturally, you'll want a decent pixel size to begin with, something around 6000 - 8000 pixels long side. A good DSLR will give you that. Such a file will work at any size, as is.

Norman Sanders
Legend
August 29, 2017

Something doesn't add up.

You wrote 36"x 24" up to 8ft x 10ft.

Even if you transposed the first set of numbers to 24" x 36" the proportion would not work out to 8' x 10'. You may want to discuss this with your client.

Getting back to 8x10: In the days when Kodak was king of the hill, I recall that in their literature they mentioned a rule-of-thumb usual viewing distance as 1.5 to 2 times the diagonal of the print.  That would make the math (thanks to Pythagoras and assuming a factor of 1.5) = 20 ft. Dag's advice regarding very low res is on the button. His recommendations always are.

Trevor.Dennis
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 30, 2017

Yep.  Not even Lab Colour could overcome that sort of aspect ratio problem.