Skip to main content
Participant
February 3, 2026
Question

GoodStack Denying Nonprofit Discount Based on Criteria Not in Adobe's Policy

  • February 3, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 47 views

I'm requesting clarification—and frankly, accountability—regarding GoodStack's denial of our nonprofit application for Adobe products.

Our Organization

Adult & Teen Challenge of Central Canada is a registered Canadian charity operating long-term residential programs. We are not a hospital, clinic, or medical facility. We employ no medical staff. We provide no clinical treatment, detoxification, or healthcare services of any kind.

Our program is a faith-based discipleship community where individuals live and work in a supported environment while rebuilding their lives. Residents participate voluntarily. The model is closer to a residential training program than anything resembling medical care.

The Denial

GoodStack denied our application on the basis that we are a "treatment organization." However, Adobe's published ineligibility criteria state:

"Hospitals, clinics, or facilities providing direct medical care"

We are none of these. The word "treatment" does not appear in Adobe's eligibility policy. GoodStack appears to be applying an internal interpretation that exceeds Adobe's actual guidelines.

The Broader Concern

In Canada, drug and alcohol dependence is a recognized disability under federal and provincial human rights legislation. Categorically excluding nonprofit organizations because they serve people with addiction histories—while framing it as a "treatment" exclusion—raises serious questions about disability-based discrimination.

A literacy charity serving formerly incarcerated individuals qualifies. A job-training nonprofit serving refugees qualifies. But a discipleship program serving people rebuilding their lives after addiction does not? The distinction isn't based on Adobe's published policy—it's based on who our residents are.

What I'm Asking

  1. Where in Adobe's nonprofit eligibility criteria does "treatment organization" appear as an exclusion?
  2. What specific evidence led GoodStack to classify ATC as a "facility providing direct medical care"?
  3. Is there an appeal process for organizations that have been miscategorized?

I'm happy to provide documentation of our programming, staffing model, and charitable status to demonstrate that we do not meet the "direct medical care" exclusion.

    3 replies

    Participant
    February 12, 2026

    Update — Issue Resolved: GoodStack has now resolved this and our classification has been corrected.

    The original denial appears to have been driven by an assumption that we are a medical facility / hospital / direct-care treatment provider. We are not. Adult & Teen Challenge of Central Canada is a registered Canadian charity and community service organization.

    We serve the wider community through multiple charitable programs that reduce the impact of addiction locally, including:

    • Skills training and employment readiness for people rebuilding their lives after addiction

    • A long-term residential recovery program designed as a live-in community

    • Community offices where people can seek help and connect with us and other community supports

    • Outpatient support groups for families and individuals

    • A soup kitchen feeding hundreds daily

    • Housing supports for vulnerable people

    I’m thankful this was reviewed and corrected. I also encourage greater clarity in the application/category fields—because supporting people who struggle with addiction does not automatically make an organization a medical facility. We are supported by the existing public healthcare system and help individuals access clinics and hospitals when medical care is needed, while we provide a safe community, support, and housing as people pursue freedom from addiction.

    Final note: I suspect some of the confusion may come from differences between the U.S. and Canadian healthcare contexts. In the U.S., many addiction-related residential programs are operated as clinical “treatment facilities” within private or insurance-based healthcare models. In Canada, healthcare is delivered through the public system, and community charities often provide non-clinical residential recovery supports, housing, navigation, and wraparound services while medical care (clinical treatment, physicians) remains with hospitals and clinics. From a U.S. lens, “residential recovery” can be assumed to mean “medical treatment,” but that isn’t how our programs operate here.

    DavidHenry1993
    Participant
    February 12, 2026

    It is good to hear that this was resolved. Our church in Winnipeg, Manitoba where your main office is, and we have seen an impact in our community from Teen Challenge of Central Canada. We support you in your work, thank you for what you do, it is a very tough field to work in at times, but it is so very much needed!

    Ash @ Goodstack
    Participant
    February 12, 2026

    Hi Jordan,

    I hope you have been keeping well.

    I’m happy that we were able to review your application and was able to determine that your organization is eligible for Adobe for Nonprofits.

    Please be sure to contact us directly if there is anything else we can look into for you.

    Ashley

    DavidHenry1993
    Participant
    February 3, 2026

    This really doesn’t sit right with me.

    I’m part of a small church and I know Adult & Teen Challenge as an organization. What you’re being described as here just doesn’t match what you actually are. ATC isn’t a hospital, a clinic, or a medical program. It’s a voluntary, faith-based residential community where people are given time, structure, and support to rebuild their lives.

    Labeling that as “direct medical care” feels like a stretch at best. And the bigger issue is how this seems to hinge on who you serve rather than what you do. People with addiction histories shouldn’t be treated as a reason for exclusion, especially when other nonprofits serving marginalized groups are clearly eligible.

    I appreciate how clearly and calmly you’re asking for answers. Wanting to know where this classification came from, and whether there’s a way to appeal it, is more than reasonable. I really hope GoodStack and Adobe take another look and give you a fair response. 

    I’ll be keeping an eye on this post to see what transpires.