Skip to main content
This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

Erik Lord
Erik Lord
Inspiring
March 24, 2018

I love the *idea* of driverless cars. The improved traffic flow alone could be a huge boon as opposed to tpeople who are on their phones or otherwise distracted. Road rage could be lowered significantly...unless maybe someone sets their car to 'overly aggressive driving'

But yes, I am absolutely wary at this point. I've no desire to own one until those first-adopters get all the bugs worked out.

One downside will be, of course 'drivers' will be even more distracted. The biggest reason I'm focused when driving is cause I just have to be. Any distraction can immediately be an accident. But put my car on auto-pilot? Maybe I'll be alert at first but within a few accident-free months, I'll be checking the phone, dozing off, eating a sub...

Ussnorway7605025
Ussnorway7605025Author
Legend
March 22, 2018

Legibly speaking, someone is always at fault... A human driver is expected to look in all directions that could reasonably have impact and not be reading a newspaper or talking on a mobile phone i.e, they would be charged!

If I build a powerful machine that can kill people and don't erect barrages with warning signs to stop people coming near it then when some homeless person wonders into the area and is killed, I am legibly at fault ... The law says that at the end of the day, whom ever allowed that machine on the road is at fault and the police are selling bs in that statement

Trevor.Dennis
Community Expert
Trevor.DennisCommunity Expert
Community Expert
March 22, 2018

Just seen this footage of the accident on BBC News

Uber self-driving crash: Footage shows moment before impact - BBC News

One moment there is just darkness, and the next, the person pushes a bicycle out of the shadows. I think that might be the front wheel of the bike in the bottom right corner of my cyan highlight.

The next few frames suddenly show her walk out of the deep shadow.

I'd like to think that the car has systems a LOT more sensitive than this dashcam, although come to think of it, my dashcam has pretty decent light amplification, and displays a brighter image than what my eyes show me.   They need to do some more work before I'd feel safe sharing the roads with these systems.  Especially at night.

jane-e
Community Expert
jane-eCommunity Expert
Community Expert
March 23, 2018

Trevor.Dennis  wrote

The next few frames suddenly show her walk out of the deep shadow. They need to do some more work before I'd feel safe sharing the roads with these systems.  Especially at night.

My husband was an avid cyclist, putting in 2-3,000 miles per year. He would have called her a "ninja" cyclist. She wore all dark clothing, had nothing reflective, and had no lights on her bike. The car had headlights, but for some reason, she didn't see those until the last horrifying minute. And she disobeyed local laws by jaywalking.

We are sharing roads with these cars right now, like it or not (I don't). So when out and about at night, remember not to be a ninja. Wear reflective clothing and pay attention. Look before you cross the street.

I am sorry for all parties involved—the poor woman who died and her family, and the Uber driver who was hired to drive the car.

Uber did the right thing to stop the experiment. I don't like the idea of these driverless cars on the road.

OldBob1957
OldBob1957
Inspiring
March 21, 2018

I am no fan of either Uber or self-driving cars, but there may be more to this incident -- it may not be the driver's (car's) fault. See the article below:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Exclusive-Tempe-police-chief-says-early-probe-12765481.php

It starts with...

Pushing a bicycle laden with plastic shopping bags, a woman abruptly walked from a center median into a lane of traffic and was struck by a self-driving Uber operating in autonomous mode.

“The driver said it was like a flash, the person walked out in front of them,” said Sylvia Moir, police chief in Tempe, Ariz., the location for the first pedestrian fatality involving a self-driving car. “His first alert to the collision was the sound of the collision.”

Elsewhere that same Police Chief has been quoted as saying that the accident may have been unavoidable "no matter what mode the vehicle was in." They will be reviewing the camera footage from the car and checking for any other witnesses, or footage from other security cameras in the area that they can find.

I guess what I am saying is; though I am no fan of self-driving technology -- not as it currently exists -- let us wait to judge until all the facts are in.

--OB

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices