1 Correct answer
Well, the level of correspondance in typographical features between Adobe XD and other design applications, brought over as CC Library assets, is... let's describe it carefully... abysmal. There's not a slight sign of love between these two fairly new institutions.
To verify and confirm your findings, I created 4 kinds of assets from a text frame (with horizontally scaled text) in Illustrator: just Text, a Character Style, Paragraph Style, and an Image.
And I tested what currently is bein
...
6
Replies
Well, the level of correspondance in typographical features between Adobe XD and other design applications, brought over as CC Library assets, is... let's describe it carefully... abysmal. There's not a slight sign of love between these two fairly new institutions.
To verify and confirm your findings, I created 4 kinds of assets from a text frame (with horizontally scaled text) in Illustrator: just Text, a Character Style, Paragraph Style, and an Image.
And I tested what currently is being understood by Adobe XD,
either by dragging or selecting (as frame or text) and applying.
The Character Style isn't supported or recognised at all – nada:
The Paragraph Styles isn't even shown, neither is the Text.
The only asset which offers some co-operation is the Image,
but even as an image, it completely ignores any textual styling:
So we can rightfully state that CC Libraries is a terribly flawed (not to say absolutely failed) area of integration in Adobe XD. Even Adobe's support of Images from CC Libraries in Microsoft PowerPoint is better:
(Although this surprising implementation ignores something as basic as Colors...)
AdChoices