Beenden
  • Globale Community
    • Sprache:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티

ACX Requirements

Neu hier ,
Jul 30, 2018 Jul 30, 2018

Hi -

I am new to Audition CC 2018 and ACX. I am currently trying to get my submission ready, but am having difficulty in figuring out a few things:

How do I get these measurements correct?

I realize that noise floor is more about the sound in the recording room, but how do I make sure that the dB are at the correct levels?

I've researched and it seems to have something to do with compressing, but I could be wrong.

If another ACX-er could supply a quick step by step tutorial, I would be so very grateful! Let me know if you need other info from me.

2.6K
Übersetzen
Melden
Community-Richtlinien
Seien Sie freundlich und respektvoll, geben Sie die ursprüngliche Quelle der Inhalte an und suchen Sie vor dem Absenden Ihres Beitrags nach Duplikaten. Weitere Informationen
community guidelines

correct answers 1 richtige Antwort

Community Expert , Jul 31, 2018 Jul 31, 2018

Typically, ACX don't supply anything like an adequate definition of what they want, but I think that it's what the Audition Amplitude Statistics (the key to all of this) reports as Total RMS amplitude:

Amplitude statistics on spoken word file 1.JPG

In this screengrab, you'll see that it indicates a value of -29.62d\b on that file, which I normalized to -3dB, and that's what you have to do, basically - normalize your file to -3dB and scan the amplitude statistics. When it doesn't come out right, almost invariably it's because there are peaks i

...
Übersetzen
Community Expert ,
Jul 31, 2018 Jul 31, 2018

Typically, ACX don't supply anything like an adequate definition of what they want, but I think that it's what the Audition Amplitude Statistics (the key to all of this) reports as Total RMS amplitude:

Amplitude statistics on spoken word file 1.JPG

In this screengrab, you'll see that it indicates a value of -29.62d\b on that file, which I normalized to -3dB, and that's what you have to do, basically - normalize your file to -3dB and scan the amplitude statistics. When it doesn't come out right, almost invariably it's because there are peaks in the signal (you can see them clearly) and these are what you need to reduce, as they've keeping the average signal much lower than it needs to be. Yes you use compression or limiting to do this, but after you've done it, it's important to normalize again (and each time you do it, in fact) otherwise the peak amplitude will be wrong. As long as you keep your file and processing at this stage as 32-bit floating point, you'll lose nothing by doing this.

Here's what happens when I knock all the peaks off this file, renormalize it and measure it again:

Amplitude statistics on spoken word file 2.JPG

You'll notice that the average value of the signal has now risen considerably, and the Total RMS value is now -20.9dB - quite a jump! But as far as I can tell, this is pretty much what they want your signals to look like, as it appears to meet most of their criteria. What doesn't meet them in this recording though is the noise floor, which as you rightly surmise is down to the background noise in your room. You can vary this to an extent during the recording process; the closer you are to the mic, the less room noise you record - but you shouldn't overdo this - it's quite disturbing for the listener.

I used the Dynamics Processor as a limiter at -15dB to achieve the second shot above, but you can use anything available, as long as it works, sounds good and measures okay. With your first submission though, make sure you save the 32-bit edited original before processing - if ACX tell you that they don't like it, it's then relatively easy to reprocess that.

Übersetzen
Melden
Community-Richtlinien
Seien Sie freundlich und respektvoll, geben Sie die ursprüngliche Quelle der Inhalte an und suchen Sie vor dem Absenden Ihres Beitrags nach Duplikaten. Weitere Informationen
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 31, 2018 Jul 31, 2018

I should add that if you have an existing recording where the noise floor isn't low enough, then judicious use of NR (high FFT setting, and only take a few dB off with the first pass, then rescan the noise and do another pass, possibly repeating this a third time) can sometimes work. You have to be really careful though, as artifacts show far more clearly with spoken word files.

Übersetzen
Melden
Community-Richtlinien
Seien Sie freundlich und respektvoll, geben Sie die ursprüngliche Quelle der Inhalte an und suchen Sie vor dem Absenden Ihres Beitrags nach Duplikaten. Weitere Informationen
community guidelines
Neu hier ,
Aug 01, 2018 Aug 01, 2018
AKTUELL

Thank you! That is very helpful! I appreciate the tutorial! All the best!

Übersetzen
Melden
Community-Richtlinien
Seien Sie freundlich und respektvoll, geben Sie die ursprüngliche Quelle der Inhalte an und suchen Sie vor dem Absenden Ihres Beitrags nach Duplikaten. Weitere Informationen
community guidelines