Ive been using Frame since v2.0 for Unix (1990). Since version 4 (1995), Ive been asking for a method to allow control over certain aspects of a template and documents based on that template. For example, if multiple authors are working on the same documents, how do we ensure all the documents look the same? I think the solution is to allow the template developer to lock-down certain aspects and possibly disable certain features. For example, some of the paragraph tags, character tags, and master pages could be locked-down, and possibly the template developer could disable the Paragraph, Character, and/or Table Designers, if desired.
Adobe could allow the author to see locked-down and unlocked tags, but tags that are not available to the author could be put into a window that can only be viewed by the template developer (e.g., authorization based on a password). This would give large documentation groups more control over the documents they publish.
At this time, I only have two ways to resolve this problem, and one I cant remember how I did it:
1. Reapply the template to every document and select While Updating, Remove Other Format/Layout Overrides.
2. The second method has something to do with holding down a key while opening or creating a MIF file. Whatever I did, the outcome produced a file that let me know all of the tags, overrides, etc. in a document. Can someone refresh my memory and tell me how this is done?
Either one of these methods require someone to police each document before its published. There has to be a simpler way to control documents. Does anyone have other ideas?
BTW, in my days at Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), we had very defined templates in which the author batched their print job against and then it would produce a postscript file based on the template the author chose. The author couldnt alter the template, but could alter the layout slightly by adding code to their document, although if it went against department standards, prior to release, it would be noticed by Release Engineering, who would modify the document/code to comply with company standards. The result: all docs looked the same. And since we had editors, something rarely done in the Atlanta area, we could have multiple authors write the manual (typically done at DEC) since a good editor can align writing styles to make it seem as though one author wrote the entire manual.
Thanks,
Chris Mack
Documentation Project Manager
The Coca-Cola Company
Atlanta, GA.