I herein wish to petition my grievances with the equation editor.
I would like equations from Framemaker to look better. If FM-produced equations can approach the aesthetic excellence of LATEX-produced equations, then I would see no other reason whatsoever for me to consider using LATEX or anything other than FM!!!
Some of the few issues with equations:
1) Shrinkwrapping equation frames. Try this for example: create a new medium equation and just type in the letter "f". Shrinkwrap the equation. You will see that the tail of the letter "f" is chopped off. What happened? Believe it or not, this is common. This chopping-off happens sometimes on the top-bottom as well.
2) Allow the option to shrinkwrap ALL equations (or maybe all highlighted equations) in a document. This used to be possible with earlier versions of FM, and it was very useful.
3) Operators such as integrals and summations and their limits or indices look very clunky. I very often have to microposition limits and indices to make them look good. Look at an equation with integrals and summations generated with LATEX, and you will notice the difference. [I am really not trying to make a general comparison between FM and LATEX. I consider the earlier better in all respects except equations. But since LATEX is considered the paradigm by mathematicians, physicists, or anyone who has a lot of equations in their documents, I think its not a bad idea to look at that for inspiration when improving the equation editor in FM].
4) Diacritical marks. Try this: create a new medium equation and type in the capital Greek delta. Then put an overbar on it. Why on earth is the overbar so far away from the Delta? Please bring it closer.
5) More simple alignment problems. Try typing x squared in an equation. There are 2 ways to do this. a) start a medium equation, type in x, then click the appropriate button from OPERATORS in the equation palette. b) type x SHIFT+6 2. These 2 different ways produce 2 different x-squares. Neither of the 2 however looks right. The superscripted 2 in the first case is too high and in the second case too low. Something between the two would be ideal. Again I have to use micropositioning to get it right.
6) Please do something about bold and italic Greek letters in equations. This is a terrible deficiency. The default Symbol postscript font doesnt have bold and italic, but bold and italic Greek letters are VERY common in the technical literature. Bold letters are to symbolize vectors, matrices, and tensors. Greek letters (just like Latin letters) should be italicized if they represent a scalar variable.
7) Include more operators, symbols, delimeters . LATEX and the Math Type editor have a vast array of options not available in the FM editor.
8) When having multi-line equations, please add features for line breaking and aligning the equations.
To ensure satisfactory results, I would suggest that the task of improving the equation editor be assigned (or at least overseen) to someone who actually knows or has had experience with technical publications rich with equations.