3D mapped art quality is horrible!

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
February 9, 2024
2 replies
1190 views

Frustrated... 3D-mapped art quality is horrible in the new 3D workspace. The mapped art was so much better quality in the old workspace. Why??? Yes... I have my render settings high and doc. raster effects are set to 300ppi. What is the deal?

This topic has been closed for replies.

Ton Frederiks

Community Expert

I agree, even with high quality ray tracing 600 ppi raster settings, the newer 3D effect gives a lower quality than the faster Classic one (that previews even better with CPU Preview).

Monika Gause

Community Expert

@Ton Frederiks schrieb:

I agree, even with high quality ray tracing 600 ppi raster settings, the newer 3D effect gives a lower quality than the faster Classic one (that previews even better with CPU Preview).

True. But the file in this case is really special. You can do what you want, but it doesn't get better. Really weird.

Monika Gause

Community Expert

Did you activate the Raytracing and also clicked on Render in that little popup?

C

christianpdupontAuthor

Participating Frequently

Yep

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded