Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
In Photoshop, you can pull an image's control handles around to your heart's content, and fine tune the distortion to line up with a perspective grid. In Illustrator, you can only distort the bounding box of the whole shape, so once you move a single control handle, you lose control of one or more corners of the image, making precise distortions almost impossible. The best we have right now is the Effect > Distort & Transform > Free Distort tool, but there's no preview, so again, you can't line up the shape with a perspective grid.
Please make Illustrator's Free Distort tool like Photoshop's!
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I second that. It's a glaring omission from the program. (And, no, the new Perspective Tool is not a solution... that's just overkill.)
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Oh yeah, there is that, too. But like you say, there's so much overhead in setting up the perspective grid, I never use it.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Absolutely agree.
Can't Adobe's Photoshop team spend a few months working on Illustrator and make it more Photoshoppy?
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I concur.
And if the Illustrator team ever get around to evaluating their basic Path functionalities they might also drop the current stupid (yes, that adjective is provocative, but in my opinion justified) path-closing behaviour of eliminating the first point’s backward bezier handle.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I'm not aware of any stupid path-closing behavior in Illustrator... are you sure you don't mean InDesign? In InDesign, you have to pull the closing bezier handle backwards.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I'm aware of it. I always have to adjust my first segment all over again if I close the path. Are you saying there's a way around it?
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I'm away from my computer for the next several days, so I can't look at the path closing behavior of Illustrator right now. But I don't think I've ever noticed anything odd about it, save for the annoying way it doesn't constrain the final bezier handle to the same angle of the first.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
save for the annoying way it doesn't constrain the final bezier handle to the same angle of the first.
I think what you describe might pretty much is what I meant; when one starts a path with a curve point that point’s backward handle is destroyed on closing the path and one has to drag out the complete handles for that point anew if one wants it to stay a curve point.
Jeff Talmage has provided a Script for closing a path with maintaining the first point’s handle, but the Illustrator team really should just make that standard behaviour in my opinion.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Oh, I see what you mean. You're identifying that handle as the "backward handle", not describing the handle as backward.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
There is a tedious but effective workaround: Copy and paste the object into Photoshop as a path, use the superior distortion tools there, and then export it back into Illustrator.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
+1
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
How is it that the Illustrator team didn't make this possible? The free transform tool is virtually useless, and the perspective tool is too much of a hassle. It's a simple function. Take a stroll over to your friends in the Photoshop department and get them to walk you through it.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I know, right?
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
To me this is a very infuriating problem. Not only is it something that is commonly needed, and would be extremely useful, but it is something that should've been a basic function since Illustrator Version 1. And when it was included there, it easily should've been FIXED in Version 2, etc. This should've been worked on long before adding symbols, and advanced gradient options, and so on. I love those things, but seriously guys: Basic path manipulation is first and foremost what Illustrator is about. And there is ZERO excuse for not having it. You can't say the technology or know how doesn't exist. As countless others have stated—to deaf ears, apparently—Photoshop's had this feature for years. And Photoshop isn't even a vector editor, and they do it right.
Everytime a new version of Illustrator comes out I get my hopes up thinking this will be fixed, only to be let down. It's really disappointing.
So please, stop the stupid bounding box from resetting after every adjustment!
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
There are hundreds of things that should've been in Illustrator since version 1. There are also hundreds of things that should've been fixed in Illustrator version 2, 3, 4 and all the next. But it's too much of a hassle to spend time and resources to make your product better if people will still buy it no matter how awful and broken it is. Because there are no real alternatives anyway. Monopoly in all its "glory".
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I used to use CorelDraw in the 90s; and they HAD SUCH FEATURE BACK THEN! it's shocking to see Illustrator in 2022 and not have such feature; not sure if I should laugh or cry.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Hold back your tears. The Free Distort tool was updated in the 2020 version.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
I've had my head down working with Illustrator for so long that I had no idea that Photoshop had better vector transformation tools than its supposedly vector-centric teammate!
A long time ago I worked on the development of the product LetraStudio and the Illustrator plug-in Envelopes. (My - thoroughly microscopic - claim to fame is that I introduced the now-widespread word 'envelope' in a distortion context.) LetraStudio pioneered free distortion of vectors, and as a I recall both it and Envelopes had features which we have yet to see in Illustrator. Nonetheless I was delighted when Illustrator adopted 'enveloping' - imitation, sincere flattery and so on.
To find, after all this time, that Illustrator has to look to its bitmap stablemate for a better implementation of LetraStudio's idea is frankly shocking. I imagine most of the development teams in Adobe, perhaps especially Illustrator's, must be tired of seeing the bulk of interest and resources disappear in the direction of Photoshop. Of course Photoshop is an important product (the only software product name to have become a verb?). But the next release of Illustrator will be time to correct this embarrassing and shameful imbalance.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Bump.
Same product since CS1 reskinned every year.
Considering that the future of graphics design is 100% vector considering the wide range of resolutions for which support is required (TVs, tablets, retina vs standard) this is utter bullshit.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
i have illustrator cs5. i just found a copy of letrastudio 2.0 and wonder if there is anything in it that illustrator doesn't already have or do – like letrastudio distortion envelopes?
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
This is a huge omission. are there any third party plugins that will make this all the distortion tools available in photoshop to be available in Illustrator?
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
Joining the chorus of laments - I really really need this particular feature, and implore Adobe to revamp Illustrator's free distortion to work as effectively as Photoshop's
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
The sad thing is, even if they do fix it, you'll have to pay $50/month to be able to use it. No new features coming to Creative Suite apps without a subscription to Creative Cloud.
Copier le lien dans le Presse-papiers
Copié
What a regrettable move on Adobe’s part.
Trouvez plus d’idées, d’événements et de ressources dans la nouvelle communauté Adobe
Explorer maintenant