Generative Fill Restrictions: this is just getting silly...

Question

I wanted to make a 'fist surrounded by a nimbus of power' using Generative Fill in AI. It told me I was violating user guidlelines. I tried just 'Fist' by itself and was told te same thing, so I know it is not 'Nimbus' or 'Power' causing the problems.

That is seriously ridiculous.

As a game designer, who designs material for games that involve fighting at times, this makes Adobe AI products pretty useless. As a professor who is teaching about AI and art, I've actually switched to DALL-E for the class, because Firely was to restrictive to let my students genreate material for their projects.

You have got to find a better balance between actual serious harm and putting rubber baby buggy bumpers on everything in existence. Let people be adults for goodness sakes...

Jacob Bugge · Answer

default06,

When the first nanny filter appeared here in 2009 it was forbidden to mention the Live Paint Bucket Tool, until some of us mentioned that it made helping difficult.

In the first many years, the nanny filter consistently went for words that might have a rude meaning in American English, even those with an innocent main meaning such as the common (other) word for a donkey, whereas the corresponding unambiguously rude (taboo slang) British English word would pass unnoticed.

Those days are (at least mostly) over, but it seems that non English words may still be too tough to handle for the Generative Fillter.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded