Skip to main content
ob_defaultB838
Participant
January 24, 2017
Answered

How do I change the ppi to dpi in AI CS6?

  • January 24, 2017
  • 9 replies
  • 28528 views

How do I change the ppi to dpi in AI CS6?

    Correct answer Om Nath Jha

    I'm getting my image printed and the printer needs the files in 300dpi.

    There's a tutorial to change dpi, or at least check it's at 300dpi, at How to Change DPI in Illustrator - YouTube Problem is, I only get ppi at that menu, not dpi. (Hence my question and I think the original question was probably about the same issue).

    How do I check that my print resolution will be 300dpi? Or do I trust it will be ok anyway because it's all vectors?


    Hi Tracey,

    If it's all vector, you should not worry about the print resolution. I completely agree with Monika in this context.

    Regards,

    Om

    9 replies

    Legend
    June 19, 2018

    Most people believe PPI is the correct name, but some people call it DPI for the same thing. Illustrator is right.

    Legend
    March 7, 2018

    There are dpi<->ppi converters on the web? So there are, just as there are RGB<->CMYK converters put up by people who nothing about the subject but know how to count clicks, and know that people who know no more than they do go looking for fantasy information... Here is something from the first dpi<->ppi converter I found:

    Well, that should come in handy.

    JETalmage
    Inspiring
    March 7, 2018

    The fact is, as in many other things, the terms being argued about have simply been used inconsistently; by users, by printers, and even by software vendors. So it's incumbent upon the designer to have at least an upper-level concept of the physical processes involved in order to discern the actual meaning from the specific context. But it's not rocket science.

    Pixels Per Inch should be self-explanatory. A raster image is basically a string of color values arranged in a rectangular array. Each pixel (picture element) is just a data placeholder for a color value, usually (but not necessarily) rendered as a square. So it has no inherent size. (Runaway confusion has resulted from software vendors treating "Pixels" as if it is an actual unit of linear measure in the rulers of object-based graphics programs.) A pixel is actually infinitely scalable. So you have to specify the overall size of the image as a scaling factor. That's the "per inch" (or other linear unit of measure) part. It's a scaling value, and it is required to say anything meaningful about the measurable "size" of a raster image.

    Dots Per Inch is far and away the most ambiguous term, having for so long been applied (and misapplied) to just about everything, because it's often the only term a speaker is even familiar with. It has for decades been used (and misused) interchangeably with, and instead of, PPI. Frankly, it should be abandoned, especially when the meaning is important, as in stating printing requirements. (Even though those stated requirements are often not really optimal.)

    Lines Per Inch. Graphics, of course, quite often involve regions which vary in color. Litho printing devices normally don't print anything by physically laying down "smears" or "blends" of solid ink. The press simply either prints ink or prints no ink. So continuous-tone graduations and uniform tints (both of which can be required by either raster or vector elements) have to be simulated by printing an array of small dots of solid ink. (again, each dot in a given place on the page is either ink or "no ink." There is no "partial ink.")

    That process of conversion to dots of ink is historically called screening because, long before computers, the high-contrast film used to expose the printing plates was itself exposed while in vacuum contact with a film (called a halftone screen or a tint screen) through which the original image of the photo or artwork (which is either continuous-tone or line-art) was projected on the process camera in the litho darkroom.

    (So much confusion among beginning digital designers could be cleared up by a solid understanding of the differences between contone and line art. Unfortunately, you seldom hear those terms nowadays.)

    Although nowadays, with computers, screening can be accomplished either by varying the sizes of uniformly-spaced dots (AM screening, borrowing the term Amplitude Modulation from wave dynamics) or inversely by varying the spacing of uniformly-sized dots (FM screening, borrowing the term Frequency Modulation) halftone screening is still most common and is still specified in terms of LPI.

    Spots Per Inch. Here's another conceptual key that clears up a lot of confusion, not just about the various acronyms, but about the matter of printer resolution: Whether you are talking about AM dots (halftone screening) or FM dots (stochastic screening) each of those tiny screen dots is built up from much tinier spots of actual ink (or toner or whatever). These are the "dots" which the printing device really prints. They are all the same size. They are, in other words, the smallest mark the printing device can make on the page, and all larger marks are built up from them. That's why SPI is the term that should be used when you are talking about the actual resolution of the printing device, not DPI because, as explained, DPI has been so irreversibly overused for all kinds of things for too many decades.

    Levels of Gray. Because halftone dots are made up of printer spots, the count of different sizes of halftone dots that a given printing device can print is a function of how many printer spots are available to render the dot. That count is how many levels of gray the given device can render at a given halftone ruling. That's why you see (and beginners are distraught over) banding in low SPI devices, like 600 SPI laser printers, that won't be a problem on a 2540 SPI imagesetter. It's also why buyers are often misled by manufacturer's stated resolution of desktop devices, like inkjet printers. ("Egads! 1440 DPI! And just 300 PPI is 'perfect'! What a miracle! What a deal!" Those 1440 are printer spots, and the screening method is usually FM, not AM.

    Each halftone dot is made up of printer spots (SPI). The square array of pixels of a raster image is scaled to size (PPI) and spread across the array of lines of halftone dots (LPI), and the color values of the scaled pixels are averaged across that region of the page to determine the size of each halftone dot for each ink color.

    Contrary to some misconception, everything--be it a raster image or a vector-based path--ultimately becomes one page-size raster image. (That's why it's called a RIP; Raster Image Processor.) The difference between raster resolution dependence and vector resolution independence is not whether it will be rasterized, but when.

    By definition, the rasterization of raster images already exists when the raster image is created, so its "grid" is effectively "overlaid" onto the halftone grid and the printer spot grid of the device. So sharpness is dependent upon how the pixels are scaled and how those various "overlaid" grids correspond. The rasterization of vector-based graphics is deferred until print time. So vector-based graphics have no raster resolution until they are printed. They print at the actual appropriate resolution of whatever printing device(s) to which they are sent.

    JET

    Legend
    March 7, 2018

    What do you mean by " the backward software will re-render the image in 96 DPI."?

    Participating Frequently
    March 7, 2018

    Outlook uses Word-technology to compress images before sending an email and rerenders the image upon delivery. This causes the image to lose quality and has been a problem for a long time. Only the newest version of Outlook now supports SVG images, but not older versions. So there is just no single solution (as far as I know).

    Monika Gause
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    March 7, 2018

    So let's summarize:

    Micorsoft developers can't tell dpi and ppi apart

    On top of that they scale images through some weird algorithm that is not documented

    The result is that HTML e-mails look bad in Outlook.

    But you are "bothered by the answers" given in this thread?

    Participating Frequently
    March 7, 2018

    This question is extremely relevant if you're trying to send an image as part of an email and most of your subscribers use Outlook desktop. Outlook can only handle 96 DPI. If an image is more or less than that, the backward software will re-render the image in 96 DPI.

    Even Adobe has problems with sending proper emails to Outlook clients. Images within their promotional emails are often of low quality when opened in Outlook (regardless the version).

    So yes, this question makes 100% sense, because Microsoft (among other email client providers) forces marketers and bloggers to downgrade their emails.

    And no, I don't have an answer. I was just bothered by the answers given here.

    Doug A Roberts
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    March 7, 2018

    if outlook actually says DPI, it means PPI.

    Participating Frequently
    March 7, 2018

    Outlook doesn't say anything about this (as far as I know). I've found nothing in the entire Help section about it. In addition, I now know Outlook's technology is based on outdated 1993 Word software. To make matters worse, DPI or PPI scaling is apparently influenced by different versions of Outlook. This makes implementing a simple solution even harder. It's debated in detail in the comment section of this article: Mystery Solved: DPI Scaling in Outlook 2007-2013 > Litmus

    Perhaps I'm overlooking the solution. Admittedly, the frustration is not making me a better person.

    Participant
    May 19, 2017

    When I go to Go Effects > Document Raster Effects Settings > Check your preferred dpi - I don't have any dpi options, they are all in ppi and only giving me RGB, Grayscale and Bitmap.

    I've got my proof at working CMYK but can't see what else needs changing to make sure I'm given the dpi instead of the ppi settings.

    Any suggestions appreciated.

    Monika Gause
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    May 19, 2017

    Image resolution is measured in ppi, not dpi.

    Vector files don't have a resolution at all.

    Only raster elements inside vector document have a resolution, which is measured in ppi.

    dpi is the unit to describe the resolution of a printer.

    Why do you think you need to define image resolution in dpi?

    Participant
    May 19, 2017

    I'm getting my image printed and the printer needs the files in 300dpi.

    There's a tutorial to change dpi, or at least check it's at 300dpi, at How to Change DPI in Illustrator - YouTube Problem is, I only get ppi at that menu, not dpi. (Hence my question and I think the original question was probably about the same issue).

    How do I check that my print resolution will be 300dpi? Or do I trust it will be ok anyway because it's all vectors?

    John Mensinger
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    January 24, 2017

    Well, while I'd agree with Monika that your question is erroneous in nature, at least it seems to acknowledge that ppi and dpi are not the same thing, and should not be used interchangeably, as they are all too often.

    DPI = Dots Per Inch; a measure of physical printer resolution, and not under your control via Illustrator.

    PPI = Pixels Per Inch; a measure of raster image resolution.

    There is no direct or constant conversion factor between the two, and so there is no need for you to seek out a method for doing so.

    Participant
    November 8, 2017

    Thanks. Now I won't ask that question again... God Bless

    Monika Gause
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    January 24, 2017

    The question makes no sense.

    Which kind of resolution do you want to change and what do you want to achieve?

    Vector graphics is resolution independent with the exception of placed raster images and raster based effects.

    Participating Frequently
    June 20, 2024

    I think the main reason for a community is to help. My default in illustrator is ppi but I also need my file to be in dpi which isn't a straight forward process at all. 

    Why shame someone for asking for help especially when the question actually does make sense. HOW do you convert, create, change (or whatever the process is) resolution from ppi to dpi? 

    If you're an expert, which you seem to be proving, then you should understand this question and or what the person was trying to accomplish. 

    happie_97
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    January 24, 2017

    Go Effects > Document Raster Effects Settings > Check your preferred dpi