Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello community! Sorry for such a basic question.
I need to have a 13500 х 13500px | 300ppi jpg for Society6. My project mostly has vector graphics but there is one raster image as well.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Katarshis,
It is true that the final pixel x pixel size is the same.
What happens in your comparison if you use PNG instead of JPEG, ususally recommended when based on vector artwork?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you for an advice! PNG export looks sharper at the default view. But is oversharped, when zooming. Which is not necessarily a bad thing and can potentially boost printing result. But unfortunately I do not have an opportunity to check this right away. So I decided to stick with the best impression that I can get from observing an image on a monitor. I have a lot of thin lines in my design (https://foundation.app/collection/mlh), and JPG export with Baseline compression gives them a more smooth look.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You are welcome, Katarshis.
I believe the JPEG compression may be described as a soothing smoothing woolliness, and the obvious goal is to make the artwork look right, whichever way leads to it.
For some (or no) reason I came to think of this other recent thread, dealing with (very) thin lines,
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Amazing stock of information, thank you!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You are welcome, Katarshis; and I for one hope that you will share your findings (also) concerning print.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you want 13500x13500 just export at 72 ppi.
In Photoshop or (Apple Preview) change the image size to 300 ppi without resampling.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you for comment. But as as I mentioned above, if I export in 72 ppi, I get a result that is worse.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Of course, more pixels will give you a better quality, but if you need 13500x13500 at 300 ppi, that's what you get.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So you are saying a 13500 x 13500 px file that was exported from 3240 x 3240 px canvas with 300 ppi export has more pixels, than 13500 x 13500 px file that was exported from 13500 x 13500 canvas with 72 ppi? That's a bit odd) Also the output file that was exported as specified in first option already has 300 ppi in specs. So not only it has better quality, it meets the requirements without farther manipulations.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
13500 x 13500 at 300ppi v 13500 x 13500 at 72 ppi.
Do you see the difference?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
13500 px is what it is at whatever resolution you specify. Resolution is metadata, it does tell how many of those pixels should fit in an inch, it does not change the amount of pixels.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you everybody! I was filled with the knowledge of how deep the rabbit hole is and rooted in the understanding of PPI as a metadata. For my project I decided to stick with export of 3240 x 3240 px artboard via an 'Export for screens' option, JPG 100 / Baseline (standard) compression / 300 ppi.