Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I don't use AI all the time, but thought I understood the best way to scale an AI image for export. But, following the technique, I'm getting some terrible quality export files. If someone sees something I'm missing....
I started with a 640x640 pixel artboard. No particular reason for the size choice.
The artboard contains 3 text entries, and an 8-point compass rose. The rose was built using the star tool, and some triangles. It ends up including 2 4-point stars, and 8 triangles used just for coloring.
The text entries are simple 2-3 word phrases.
After building the graphics and text, I selected all objects, and scaled them to 20%. Created a new artboard, and collapsed it around the graphics (Object>Artboards).
I then export to PNG using the artboards. With one named "100pct" and the other "20pct", the result of the export is the two files.
Given all the scaling appears to be vector objects, my expectation is the graphics in both files would be high quality.
But, when I place or insert the 20pct PNG image, it's quite grainy.
I actually get acceptable results by inserting the 100pct PNG image and then scaling it to 20%. But there, I'm changing bit images, so the tolerance won't be much.
What am I doing wrong using the approach of scaling vector images into their own artboards. Shouldn't I get equally good quality in each of the PNG files?
Tom,
The actual PNG files between the two techniques are close to the same size (pixel dimension),
They ought to be exactly the same. The Save for Web is accurate, so any difference would be something strange in the Export.
but the images inserted in a document (e.g. Word), are different. The difference is about 74%, meaning the File>Save Web objects are about 74% of the Export ones once inserted in a document.
As I had understood it (I have never had/used Word), an image is inserted at a certain s
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
tdcarp wrote
The output for the test graphics is print
Apologies I've missed something amongst all this, but if your artwork is for print, why are you rasterising to PNG anyway?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks for weighing in.
It's just testing. The actual AI file is CYMK, and the final output is inserted in files like Word (or in my case, GIS maps). Exporting to PNG is just an easy way to see the results of the test.
Tom
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Tom,
With the new forums, all answers to anything but the OP (original post) are more difficult to make, Enter triggering its being sent, and they be threaded in the thread as you have already seen.
The safe way is to only use the blue Reply button at the top of the thread and then address the post so everyone can see whom it is for.
Since this thread has been threaded owing to its being transferred, I agree with Monika that a new thread would be a better way to continue.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now