Skip to main content
P
pencilking2002
Participating Frequently
March 16, 2017
Question

Access to layers in onClick event handler

  • March 16, 2017
  • 1 reply
  • 1183 views

Hi. I'm trying to access all the layers in the current document when I click a button in a custom window that I am made. Here's my code so far:

var doc = app.activeDocument;  
var palette = new Window("palette");
var button = palette.add("button", undefined, "Play");
palette.show();
button.onClick = function() {
    var numLayers = doc.layers.length;
    $.writeln(numLayers.toString());
};

The problem I am having is that the "layers" collection doesn't seem to exist in the active document when I try to access it in the onClick event. Perhaps there is something I don't understand about button event handlers?

This topic has been closed for replies.

1 reply

Silly-V
Silly-V
Braniac
March 16, 2017

This is because with palettes, this gets infinitely more complicated because you have to send the code as a string through the BridgeTalk object. See this thread for an explanation: Re: Calling functions from UI palette

P
pencilking2002Author
Participating Frequently
March 16, 2017

Thanks Silly-V​. I was able to make illustrator send a message to itself. Here's the code if anyone else needs it:

#target illustrator
var loadCode = '$.writeln(app.activeDocument.layers.length);';
var animPalette = new Window("palette");
var button = animPalette.add("button", undefined, "Play");
animPalette.show();
// When button is clicked, create the BridgeTalk Object so we can send a message
// to an application (in this case its illustrator sending  a message to itself)
button.onClick = function() {
    var bt = new BridgeTalk;
    bt.target = "illustrator";
    bt.body = loadCode;
    bt.send();
};
// Callback for when illustrator recieves the message
// We use eval to read the message string and evaluate it as JS code
BridgeTalk.onRecieve = function( message )
{
    eval(message.body);
};

I'm curious though, is there a way to extract the script you want to run, into its own file as opposed to sending it as a string?

    Silly-V
    Silly-V
    Braniac
    March 16, 2017

    Hmm, I think using a palette, you have to send anything in a string regardless - but there may be more easier ways to do this.

    You could, for example, try to send a simple message that points to a .jsx file and use the file.execute() on it.

    In my case, I typically read in external .jsx files as text and send them through BT. There's a BridgeTalkEncode function floating around here, which is essential to ensure your script string stays intact and no comments or gotchas cause syntax errors.

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices