Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Do you have an opinion about the best workflow for an InDesign document for print production with many graphics, both vector and raster? Should the graphics be placed as links to the AI and PS files? Or converted to JPEGs in AI and PS and then placed as JPEGs.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Everything about print production with InDesign comes down to an optimized PDF export.
Very generally speaking, an ID layout can manage any combination of quality images, regardless of their native format or whether they are linked or embedded, and all of the conversion of things like AI, PDF, PSD etc. will be handled seamlessly.
If there's four basic rules or practices, they're these:
There are, of course, otrher rules and guidelines but most will fit within this loose framework, and expand the details and specifics.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Marie:
Yes, you can use File > Place to add the native .psd and .ai files into your InDesign layout as linked graphics.
If you see an mistake in of the linked files, you can right click it > Edit Original to open the source program—Photoshop or Illustrator—edit it, save and close and then return to InDesign to see the update.
~Barb
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Illustrator files are best saved as native Illustrator files with PDF Compatibility turned on. This effectively embeds two files in one: a native Illustrator file and a high-res PDF.
You cannot control the options for the PDF. If the Illustrator file contains rasterized effects or placed raster images they will be embedded in the PDF portion of the file at their full resolution, which may be much higher than you need. WHen I that happens I usually save as PDF will Illustrator Editing Capabilities turned on. This is pretty much the same thing, but I can chose PDF options, like downsampling to a more appropriate resolution.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In answer specifically to the question regarding conversion to JPEG, I would say don't. First, converting vector to raster should ALWAYS be avoided until absolutley necessary -- vectors are infinitely scalable, jpegs are not. Second, while high quality jpegs can yield good ooutput under most circumstances, it's always a lossy conversion and will never get better, but will almost certainly degrade further when you export the PDF for print.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Generally speaking - all previous replies are spot on, but I would add one small extra step...
If you have a lot of heavy source files - big / complicated vectors or big PSD files with a lot of effects and layers - I would "flatten" copies before placing in the InDesign if possible... How exactly - depends on contents and if it can be automated.
Especially, B/W vectors or bitmaps - ask your printer for max resolution of the RIP and then prepare, for example, 1200/2400 dpi B/W bitmaps.
They'll compress much better and will require less processing power - and if you get resolution right - they'll go 1:1 into the PDF.