Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Anyone extend (or patch) Extendables?

Participant ,
Apr 24, 2015 Apr 24, 2015

At last check, I saw there are 39 forks of Extendables, excluding mine.

https://github.com/debrouwere/Extendables

Besides the pull requests to the original project, I'm wondering if any has made other changes to their fork (enhancements, bug fixes, etc.). And/or what other issues others have encountered wiht Extendables, since the source project currently has no issue tracker.

I'm just interesting in seeing the work others have done and collaborating, etc. since the source project isn't (actively) maintained.

I wish Github made it easier to diff/browse forks to see what changed from the source project. I haven't found out how to do it easily across 39 forks and Github is always slow to load fork detail info.

TOPICS
Scripting
982
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 26, 2015 Jun 26, 2015

Hi,

I run into this thread looking for info about Extendables (precisely their Socket implementation) - so it's not anymore maintained, which I suspected looking at the last commit date for most of the files.

Thanks in advance for any update on the subject,

Davide Barranca

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
People's Champ ,
Jun 26, 2015 Jun 26, 2015

Hi all,

Regarding to socket implementation, the simple yet powerful getUrl script from our friends at rorohiko is pretty cool

Loic

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 26, 2015 Jun 26, 2015

Hi Loïc,

how are you doing 🙂 I did look at Kris code (which is pretty cool indeed!), but I'm currently toying with POST, so extendables seemed to fit better.

Thanks,

Davide

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
People's Champ ,
Jun 29, 2015 Jun 29, 2015
LATEST

DBarranca‌ I am fine, thanks for asking I hope you are doing fine as well !

Loic

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Participant ,
Jun 26, 2015 Jun 26, 2015

FYI, I don't like how the original author doesn't offer an issue tracker (or since removed it). I set one up in my fork to track issues I've observed or heard about regarding Extendables (the original implementation at least, not sure what changes if any the other forks have). It also tracks fixes and enhancements I made and plan to make at some point, although some changes currently are in a branch not the master branch/repo.

It can be useful to see reference on issues found with Extendables. Feel free to add to it for other issues you find with Extendables, even though I may not try to fix them, still useful to reference for everybody.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 26, 2015 Jun 26, 2015

As a slightly offtopic side note,

is anyone aware of the proper way to minify/pack the whole library in a single file?

I've tried running the Python script but it keeps failing - I've looked in the doc to no avail.

Thank you,

Davide

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines