Okay, it's a little clearer now.
My simple suggestion is that you stay with the workflow and methods you're using. I don't think you'll gain much by switching to both a wholly different tool/app and developing a more standard workflow with it.
Ideally, yes, InDesign is the right tool for this job. Second, perhaps, would be Illustrator. (The two are often used interchangeably in niches like packaging design, for example.) Photoshop... well, old-school, PS was used for everything including resumes and brochures, and it grew a few features (such as live/body text handling) for that user base, but overall it's not a good tool for layout. Its advantage is that everyone seems to have a copy, licensed or not, and almost any reasonably recent version will do everything this week's version does, and so it becomes a sort of baseline tool for those getting into "graphic design."
As for picking up the methods and processes by searching the net... well, let's just say the quality and validity of the material out there, from old blogs to ChatGPT's latest epiphanies, varies. I occasionally see bits and tricks that even the very experienced crowd here might find awesome. But mostly, it's sort of mediocre stuff, often niche and from self-trained 'gurus' who know one technique or process or niche and aren't aware of their own limitations. Then... much of it is horribly outdated, and unless the author has been conscientious enough to date their post or tutorial, you can find yourself working through steps and processes that are literally two decades out of date. (And either no longer supported/working, or long since supplanted by more sophisticated features and alternatives.)
Nowhere have I seen more of this... questionable quality information than in DIY/self-/small-scale publishing, and that's without diving into the next layer of murk that is e-book publishing. Seriously. Many of the posts and advice and expertise I find in this realm should result in the authors having their computer taken away from them.
So I don't know how you exactly arrived at the workflow you've outlined, of getting (art?) templates from one source, placing and cropping them in Photoshop, adding the cover info, and then successfully getting KDP to accept them, but if it works for you, stay with it.
The alternative, what might be considered a more standard, flexible and professional approach, needs some mastery of InDesign and complex page layout, and a move away from art templates altogether, and more or less beginning with the layout numbers generated by KDP — not Ingram, not BookBaby, not some publishing blog or site, not some random book publisher's info pages — but from KDP directly... and, if needed, learning to use their layout template that "encodes" all these numbers for visual reference and guidance. (In my experience, newcomers use the templates for a few projects and then realize that careful numeric setup alone does nearly the entire job, so go that route.)
It's entirely up to you which method/s you use. If what you have is working, you don't need to change just because there's some "better" process. But if your aim is to move your work to a more professional, efficient and flexible level, InDesign is the right tool to move to, and mastering page/multi-page/complex layouts in it is the right step in that direction.
As always, this forum exists to support that learning curve, and the odd misunderstanding or discussion that goes a little off the rails should not put you off to further inquiry. If I can add one thing besides "do what works best for you," it's this: if you bring a question or problem here for help, answer any questions fully and carefully. We don't ask about this version or that version or this feature or that feature or this process vs etc. etc. to be annoying tech support drones; a particular setting or using the wrong feature can be absolutely key to resolving a bafflling problem. (There's few things more frustrating, in here, than a novice who argues and argues that the problem must be A, because he watched a YouTube video about it, and resists questions about issue B, which does indeed eventually turn out to be the problem.)
And if you're going to proceed with ID, we're here — but I recommend staying with valid tutorials, reference pages and the like that have some stamp of authority (Adobe, CreativePro, Lynda, LinkedIn) rather than random pages, blogs, queries or "answers" from AI portals. It helps a lot to be learning current, efficient, professional processes, not some trick an amateur cobbled together ten years ago, that will lead you down a road of second-rate approaches.
2 Correct answers
25
Replies
AdChoices
