Skip to main content
Known Participant
September 22, 2016

P: Slow performance on Xeon CPUs

  • September 22, 2016
  • 234 replies
  • 8979 views

I noticed that LR clone and brush tool on my XEON E5-1650 0 3.20GHz (Attention: E5-1650 0 and not E5-1650 v4) can not stress my CPU and after x minutes of working LR slow down, until I have to restart it.

Please see the full diskussion with the problem here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2210245 (test with different Lightroom versions, confrontation with a weak laptop, that works fine, tests wit other graphic grafic card, test with other bios settings etc. No results. Only restart LR or minor display resolution helps.)

Can anyone with an XEON E5-1650 0 3.2Ghz confirm this?

This topic has been closed for replies.

234 replies

Inspiring
December 14, 2017
Hi Simon, any chance you could invite me to the prerelease program too? This issue is causing me a great deal of frustration (and expense in terms of trying to solve it by throwing more hardware at the problem).
Participating Frequently
December 14, 2017
I also would like testing. I have a catalog with 150.000 RAW photos. Speed is always an issue.
info@hagens-world-photography.de
Sean H [Seattle branch]
Known Participant
December 14, 2017
How we looking for upcoming 18-core Xeon iMac pro?
[ ◉"]
Participating Frequently
December 14, 2017
Super, Thanks!
Adobe Employee
December 14, 2017
Hi Reed, you should see an invitation email to join the program.
Participating Frequently
December 13, 2017
I would definitely be interested in testing. I am a real estate photographer and I just got a Nikon D850. The raw files are huge and I can really feel it in Lightroom.

reed@TripleRPhotography.com
Adobe Employee
December 13, 2017
If you are an existing Lr Classic CC customer, and would like to test out a developer preview build that we think fixes this performance issue. Please send me a note and I'll make sure that you are invited to the prerelease program. Thanks.
Diko.bg
Known Participant
July 20, 2017
Yes.... This is my biggest issue mr. Chen! What is the issue with the local adjustments? Both healing spot and the brush?
Diko.bg
Known Participant
July 20, 2017
OK. Lovely explanation. 🙂 Thanks. Now this rises the second logical question: Why 0.51? 😉 Have you simulated it to be the best? Isn't this ratio number optimization of the traffic processor model and even vendor dependent? 😉
Inspiring
July 14, 2017
We need new build from scratch. There is no fix possible for Lr anymoore since it is 10+ year design. It is odd where oll billions of dollars of income goes?? It seems development gets only fraction of it. At best.