Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Face Detection speeds up the process of organising photos of multiple people.
The most intuitive label for face detection is using the person's name.
However, Smart Collections Any Searchable Text options fails to perfectly match the name because there are no options that understand word order. Names where first names and surnames have similar root words are easily confused.
The end result is you have to start making exception condition rules which also means being on top of every name in the list. Then you have to go through every collection to make sure there are no mistakes - of which there were.
Just tried this on 100 people and the face detection speeds things up, but every gain in time was lost to trying to fix the broken text search.
PS. Don't merge this. It has to been seen by those who own the (newer) Face Detection feature.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Edit Smart collection allows text to be searched to create a dynamically filtered image collections.
The options are:
From a UX point of view it is not immediately obvious how the first three contains variations are different. You would have to look up help or experiment to figure out what you thought it meant to confirm that it did what you were thinking.
However neither of the "contains" options successfully solves the problem if you are searching for say:
Peter Thomas and Thomas Smith, who might be two different people that you want in two different collections.
For some reason contains all works for one of the collections but for the other collection it includes both Thomas'. Weird. Had to use a does not contain in only one of them to make this work. The asymmetry doesn't make sense either.
What's the business impact? Potential privacy breach if you don't check that the filters are working properly.
The suggestion would be to have a verbatim match which should be called "Exact Match".
Clarity is important in the labelling.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Containing only the referenced key word and NO others.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I switched to Lightroom from Aperture - reluctantly to say the least.
Aperture had the ability to limit Smart Albums to filtering a specific album. This rule gave a drop down list of all the available Albums. Pretty simple and straightforward. And best of all, IT WORKED! Heck, even the new Photos app gets this (a screenshot of it is attached).
In Lightroom, in theory, you can limit a Smart Collection to a specific Collection or Collection Set, but it doesn't seem to work constantly.
PLEASE allow Smart Collections to filter via Collection Set.
PLEASE allow the "Collection" filter in the Smart Collection set to be set to "is" (as seen in the attached Photos.app screenshot). If its not an exact match, then the Collection/Collection Set doesn't get included. Including text in quotes does not perform the expected operation.
It shouldn't have to be a trial and error operation to do something which could be SO simple.
This makes Smart Collections a complete pain in the bum to use on Lightroom.
It would be amazing if Lightroom management could know that even the small things matter.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied