Skip to main content
Matthileo
Participant
December 24, 2019
In Development

P:(Masking) Add a Depth of Field blur slider

  • December 24, 2019
  • 返信数 26.
  • 5998 ビュー

Now that lightroom has masking advanced enough to take advantage of it, it would be nice if we could get a simple slider or set of sliders to add blur that looks like authentic defocus blur added directly to lightroom. 

返信数 26

Participant
April 27, 2025

Overall, the app is quite good, especially in its Premium version. However, considering the cost, I think it could offer some additional options to improve the user experience. I would like to see a lens blur option added to the mask settings, allowing you to apply blur to specific areas. This would really elevate the app's quality and versatility. 

Participant
May 22, 2024

I like the update to Lens blur. 
Will it come to use in maskering (ex. object (+invers) and the other mask

 

It will much better 

yamato713108855
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 23, 2024

I think it would be useful if masks could be created based on the depth information of lens blur.

Participant
March 1, 2025

I would love to see the blur feature added to the mask tool. I wish the blur tool had the same refinement options as in masking like object selection, background selection, etc. It's really tedious especially with photos of birds where the tool can't distinguish between a bird leg and a branch, or it blurs out the feathers with the background. Also the more refinement I have to do the slower the processing gets, to the point where I just open it in photoshop and use traditional masking and blur tools. 

luxBorealis
Inspiring
December 10, 2024

Often, the Lens Blur tool provides a much too abrupt transition from un-blurred to blurred, particularly when the background falls away from, for example, a ground bird. I realize users can brush in various amounts of blur to reduce this transition, but a linear mask would be much more efficient.
For example: Within Masking, one could "Select Background" mask, then add a "Subtract Linear Gradient" mask, followed by invoking Lens Blur to the remaining mask. This would be highly beneficial and far more efficient.

Participant
November 8, 2024

I want a feature that allows me to blur and denoise the selected area so that we can add effects like halation more accurately. 

Known Participant
October 19, 2023

Thanks. But what's a depthmap useful for, in practical terms? How can one use it? 

Wurstkrapfen
Inspiring
October 19, 2023

It's really fun to  play with https://depthy.stamina.pl/#/ just putting in any photo with an LR genereated depthmap.

Wurstkrapfen
Inspiring
October 16, 2023

I would also be great to download the generated depthmap in greyscale to use it with other tools.

I can screenshot it, desaturate and invert it, but jus beeing able to save it as jpg would be so much easier (and better quality).

berliner_ffm
Inspiring
October 16, 2023

Adding the global lens blur function is a good first step, but adding it globally is kind of counterintuitive.

The Lens Blur tool is by default a local adjustment since the focal plane has to be selected. However, we cannot take advantage of all local masking tools.

 

So to make it right I think, this tool should be split into two separate functions:

  1. New Range mask that creates a depth map (not only like the existing one, that relies on embedded depth maps in the photo)
  2. Local blur tool to add a blur effect to the selected mask

 

This would make the Depth Mask also available for other kind of local adjustments and the blur tool can also be used in conjunction with the other mask options, like Sky-, People- or Object-selection.

Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
Community Manager
October 10, 2023

While not a masking feature, Lens Blur (Early Access) was added to the Photography Products today: 
https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-discussions/p-new-ai-powered-lens-blur-early-access-available-across-all-surfaces/td-p/14116767

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
Keith Reeder
Participating Frequently
August 11, 2023

"We are all paying lots of money for the subscription therefore it is of outmost importance that our supplier - Adobe - creates a "working helping tool" and not just ignore our problem."

 

Adobe has done just that. PhotoShop. And in essence you get it for free, if you consider LightRoom to be the main reason for subscribing.