Using Lightroom mobile without syncing with the cloud
I have been using Lightroom Classic for over 10 years, quite happily. I have over 650,000 images in my catalog. However I am looking for a solution where I don't have to lug around my MacBook Pro to download and back up photos while away from home.
I can easily shoot 3000+ photos per day on 45.6MP cameras - however I am considering buying an iPad Pro to use as a "lighter" alternative to dragging my laptop everywhere.
I have a SSD drive and dongle for downloading SD and XQD cards, and I would like to work on my images on location in Lightroom, then save changes to the SSD drive. I don't want to incur massive Adobe file storing costs, when really I don't want cloud storage at all, I just want to work on my images on an iPad while i am away, then somehow sync or copy the images into my main catalog when I return. I am not interested in backups in the cloud, because I have too many images to manage that way.
Am I forced to drag my MacBook Pro laptop around, just so as I can do some image editing when I am away?
Is the iPad a non-starter for using out in the field, without incurring massive Adobe storage costs, for the short period between being out in the field and back home on the desktop computer? Seems a big waste, or does Adobe just want to siphen even more money from there customers by forcing them to pay exhorbitant storage costs for the pleasure of using a smaller device in the field - like an iPad.
Can you save any changes you make while working on the ipad, such as save the changes back into the file & then back up those photos to SSD external drive, then feed them back into your Lightroom Classic catalog upon your return?
Or do I need to find an alternative to Lightroom for the iPad to process images.
I mainly want to rename files, basic bulk editing, keywording, and sorting, so as to save time doing all of this when I return. Like I have been doing in the past with a laptop - just that the laptop is heavy to drag around.
I would be most grateful if anyone can tell me whether I am chasing a lost cause, or is there any cheaper alternative to massive Adobe storage costs, when you shoot large numbers of images and videos.
Many thanks
Kirsty
