Participant

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
May 23, 2023
1084 replies
306000 views

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

Show previous replies

S

Sarah27914909k9u3

Participating Frequently

THIS! If you (adobe) won't render an image on your cloud for whatever reason, let us render it ourselves on our own hardware.

S

Sarah27914909k9u3

Participating Frequently

Well, that's the unspoken rule for generative fill: no pretty women

S

Sarah27914909k9u3

Participating Frequently

Here's an example for me.

I want it to generate the bottom half of this picture. Note I am not putting in ANY textual prompt at all, so there is no possibility that a bad keyword triggered the behavior. Yeah the girl here is cute, but there's nothing sexual happening. There must be a boundless number of G-PG-13 bottom halves that could have been returned.

S

Sarah27914909k9u3

Participating Frequently

Interesting theory, but in the past it has created thumbs or hands or what-have-you and done a beautiful job with it. Not every fill is a home run, but it does a great job for me when it works.

B

Bob5E9A

Participating Frequently

Daniellei,

Re:But licensing other AI technologies isn't in Adobe's long-term plan with regard to FireFly. They want to use their own database of Adobe Stock images to generate outcomes...

Gaining technology fast is often about knowing your limits and acquiring technology, often through acquisitions, licencing, etc. I worked for a software company who acquired another company for $3 billion for their technology. Then we got acquired by a bigger company for our combined technology. Training on only Adobe stock would differentiate Adobe from MD. But using the best technology is a no brainer. Mary Barra just said GM will save $4oo million by using Tesla's charging technology, as will Ford.

The problem here is that no one seems to have the technology to gen fil small areas that is fully intergrated with a larger picture.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Yep, especially if people are involved. Text to image AI is evolving
quickly but Adobe has a long way to go to catch up with MJ and others.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

But licensing other AI technologies isn't in Adobe's long-term plan with regard to FireFly. They want to use their own database of Adobe Stock images to generate outcomes, thereby being able to pay contributors whenever parts of their images are used to create other images. At least that's my understand from what I've read from other sources. How they can ever manage to make this work is well beyond my comprehension, but that is apparently the plan. I don't THINK that will apply to Generative Fill in Photoshop, but once it is out of beta, Adobe will start charging people to use Adobe FireFly, probably through the purchase of credits, which Adobe says will be extremely generous in terms of what they charge for those credits.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.