Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 7, 2023

beautiful country cottage with large gardens & trail of chimney smoke was what I typed into prompt.😆😆😆

 

J E L
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 7, 2023

@JoeDugdale, I tried using this prompt, “scene from village of Meare, Somerset in England” and got a few choices. I don't know if this looks like your town, though, lol. Let us know if you get any results trying the same.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 7, 2023

Never thought of trail of smoke. Will give it a shot 

J E L
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 7, 2023

@Graham24508943nobd, what happens if you try “trail of smoke from chimney” as a prompt? I got something to start with.

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
July 7, 2023

I like making images of old cottages in the countryside and a chimney with smoke  is somthing it won't generate. It's pathetic really

Participant
July 7, 2023

Hi, i'm a food photographer and i found that i cannot generate smoke effects like it used to, this is hillarious since the "The generated image is removed because they violate user guideline" warning keep popping which mean they banned the word. Can these user guidelines get more hillarious?

Participant
July 6, 2023

It flags me for the most ridiculous images!!! Literraly trying to entend a pink wall. So frustrating.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
July 6, 2023

Something else I would like to add. A lot of people seem convinced that anything involving human skin is the reason they get these violation notices. First, as I've mentioned elsewhere, I have always been able to circumvent this issue by making an additional small selection elsewhere far removed the main selection itself. Secondly, I'm guessing the reason this happens so often is beause the majority of generative fill requests involve human skin, even though the same thing can happen when trying to remove or add other objects in areas that have no resemblance whatsoever to human skin. I also get the impression that people taking advantage of generative fill have no previous experience with other AI applications. It will be a long time, even after Gen Fill is out of beta, that hands and feet will be an issue. This is the case with most AI programs and even those that do it well only do it well 50% of the time and usually still require ediitng in Photoshop.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participant
July 6, 2023

I hope this is a bug in the system.

 

I am testing out the gerative fill, attempting to create a background using 'Meare, Somerset'. It is telling me the background was removed as it violates the user guidelines.

 

I live in Meare, Somerset and don't see how requesting my village violates any guidelines. To be hinest, this is worrying that my village would be considered a violation of guidelines.

phil bauch
Known Participant
July 6, 2023


Just as a suggestion, this would provide a much better user experience and help fixing bugs a lot faster. Not that unimportant while in beta...