P: Generated images violate user guidelines

@daniellei4510 I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you here.  They don't give out the beta out of the goodness of their hearts.  They give it out so that they can use us as free testers.  We are absolutely working for them testing this software and in return (hopefully) we end up getting a better product.  The cost to them of getting testers as broad as interested customers would be a very big number, not a tiny number.

So, if you're going to take part in a beta and don't give them honest feedback (either no feedback or unhelpful feedback), then you are completely wasting your time.  They want and need constructive criticisms and reports of bugs (I think this thread is an example of both, mostly), so any comment that tries to get people to not complain is also working against the betterment of the product.  You might complain that some of the feedback isn't very helpful, that's valid, but trying to insist that we can't complain because we aren't paying for the beta is missing the forest for the trees.

You are not paying for it. You are paying for the released version of Photoshop. You are using the beta version free of charge on a voluntary basis. As I mentioned elsewhere, I am using the beta versions for the next operating systems for the iPhone, Mac OS, Apple Watch, Apple TV, and iPad. I don't expect Apple to give me the equipment for free just because I am volunarily testing their beta software. That is not the way public betas work.

Hi, yes it does the same for women in swimsuits, actually to any woman in any situation. My problem is, that since we are paying for this program, and it isn't cheap, why are they censoring creativity? if they fear someone will use it to do something wrong, they should just publish a disclaimer. if not take the product off the market. 

Caity.psd:

Yes I used the "dot tip" in the prompt, otherwise I get the same warning than before.

But I had to start over several times because some of the legs and feet are horrible, but sometimes it's very realistic when there are old plastic bags. 😉

@JR Boulay awesome! Did you have to use the workaround "dot" in the prompt or was the result with no prompt + gen expand?

Thank you for sharing, this is helpful to see!

@debbies79739583 hello and thank you for your feedback. We (Adobe) are being cautious, yes, and hope to share an update on restrictions soon. Reminder that this is a beta and hearing requests plus constructive feedback is encouraged. Please share what you wish to do in the tool, what part you feel is lacking and we can go from there.

Best,

Caity

Good progress!

May:

September:

You're clearly new here. You need to take some time to read through the forum to understand there are work-arounds, that Adobe is not the morality police, that bugs exists and are difficult to find, and, if you were to take the time out to search Adobe Stock with the keywords, nude, boudoir, etc., you'll discover that Adobe has no issues whatsoever with skin. Meanwhile, trying going to an online AI site and attempt to create a nude female figure. Good luck.

Everything you just said I couldn't have said better.

Mark my words, Adobe. You're not the only one that will have this tech, and if you continue to feel you need to be some sort of bizarre moral filter on artists, we will leave you for the compititon. This whole issue is agreeably insane.

@danielc11218304 what is your prompt/selection?

See below, I expanded the image but like others said, placed a "." instead of leaving blank.

I was also able to add "halo above hair", baset, flowers, etc.