Skip to main content
M
MARCO35516225uuev
Participant
February 17, 2024
Answered

Conversion .dng to .jpg

  • February 17, 2024
  • 2 replies
  • 567 views

Hi all, 

when in Photoshop I save a new .dng photo (after editing with Camera Raw 16.1.1) as .jpg the file size drops from 80 MB to 600 KB. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for help. 

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer D Fosse

    There's nothing wrong. This is normal.

     

    Jpeg uses very aggressive data compression to reduce file size on disk. That compression is destructive and non-reversible, so the image deteriorates a little bit with each new resave.

     

    The reason jpeg is still used despite this serious drawback, is that it's incredibly effective. It can shrink a file down to 2-5% of native size with little immediate visual degradation. This is why it's so popular for web use.

     

    Uncompressed formats like PSD or TIFF will be bigger than the raw file. That's because one single channel at 14 bit depth is encoded into three channels at 16 bit depth. So that alone will quadruple file size. Jpeg then brings it down to a few percent of that.

     

    Never use jpeg as a working archive format. It's for final delivery, not to be modified again.

    2 replies

    D Fosse
    Community Expert
    D FosseCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    February 17, 2024

    There's nothing wrong. This is normal.

     

    Jpeg uses very aggressive data compression to reduce file size on disk. That compression is destructive and non-reversible, so the image deteriorates a little bit with each new resave.

     

    The reason jpeg is still used despite this serious drawback, is that it's incredibly effective. It can shrink a file down to 2-5% of native size with little immediate visual degradation. This is why it's so popular for web use.

     

    Uncompressed formats like PSD or TIFF will be bigger than the raw file. That's because one single channel at 14 bit depth is encoded into three channels at 16 bit depth. So that alone will quadruple file size. Jpeg then brings it down to a few percent of that.

     

    Never use jpeg as a working archive format. It's for final delivery, not to be modified again.

    Stephen Marsh
    Community Expert
    Stephen MarshCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    February 17, 2024

    JPEG is a lossy compression format. It discards data in order to make the file smaller. At higher quality levels the file is larger than at lower quality levels. This is a feature, not something that you have done wrong, unless you have chosen too low quality.

    M
    MARCO35516225uuevAuthor
    Participant
    February 17, 2024

    Thanks

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices