Skip to main content
Inspiring
May 12, 2020
Question

Incremental vs all-at-once H/S adjustment

  • May 12, 2020
  • 2 replies
  • 1423 views

Did a forum search and didn't find an answer. Also tried a general Google search and didn't find an answer. I may not be using the right search strings to generate the correct information.

 

Why would applying incremental changes to H/S via multiple adjustment layers produce a different result than applying the same total application on a single H/S layer?

 

E.g., Applying a Master Saturation adjustment of +10 and duping that layer 6 times (7 total H/S layers) gives a much different result than applying an adjustment of +70 on a single layer. 

 

Thanks

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

Chuck Uebele
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 12, 2020

In that case, it all depends on their algorithm. The +10 is most likely a multiplier. The scale is from 0 to 100, so a +10 could be only a .1 times increase. Hard to say without actually knowing the algorithm.

PhotogCdaAuthor
Inspiring
May 12, 2020

Sure. It will depend the algorithm. I just didn't know if there had been any explanation from Adobe, or one of Adobe's contracted experts, that I haven't been able to find. 

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 12, 2020

But why would you expect the Saturation setting to operate »additively«? 

Have you done some basc testing (not on a photograph naturally but on meaningful color swatches)? 

Chuck Uebele
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 12, 2020

Just iff the top of my head, the +70 in a single layer adjust the values just from the base layer. With 7 +10 adjustment layers, you're compounding the adjustments. You're not just changing the base layer, but all the corrections to the base layer.

PhotogCdaAuthor
Inspiring
May 12, 2020

Sorry, I should have also noted that the incremental result is less dramatic than the single layer approach.

 

I get what you're saying and intuitively that makes sense. The end result is different; however. It doesn't appear to compound the result of each successive layer. 

 

Examples attached. The first is the incremental approach, the second is all-at-once.