Skip to main content
SK321
Inspiring
June 7, 2024
Answered

Meta tags images as "Made with AI" if You Use Gen Fill

  • June 7, 2024
  • 21 replies
  • 47954 views

So, apparently Adobe has begun adding metadata to images that says they were made with AI (or at the very least, that AI was used) if you used Gen Fill at all. I realized this because some websites, such as Instagram, have begun automatically labeling any images I had used Gen Fill on as "Made with AI" based on the metadata Photoshop had added, without the option for me to remove the label.

I use Gen Fill to expand backgrounds a bit when I need to change the aspect ratio of an image (4x5 from a 2x3 for Instagram), or to more quickly and easily remove an unwanted object or blemish in photo I took and spent a lot of time and effort taking. I don't use it to create entirely made-up backgrounds or people. If I'd known my long hours setting up photo shoots, purchasing supplies, props, and more would all be given the label of "Made with AI" making my clients and other people think I'm just generating my photography, I would never have used Gen Fill in the first place. To me it's just been a quicker and better version of Content Aware Fill. 

So, for those of you who have had the same experience and, like me, don't want your work labeled as "Made with AI" when you've maybe used Gen Fill to remove a beer can from a photo, just export your photos as a bitmap, open them with Microsoft Paint and save them as a JPEG from there. It will remove the relevant metadata.

 

 

(subject edited by moderator to remove false information and replace it with correct information. Meta is adding that tag, not Photoshop, and they say  so in their help pages.)

 

Edit by OP: I appreciate the moderators not simply deleting this thread, because I do think this is a good discussion to have. I do believe my post clearly stated that the tag of "Made with AI" was created by Instagram (Meta) and that Photoshop was simply including an indicator (metadata/Content Credentials) with the image when it's saved out of Photoshop that showed some sort of AI was used. If the mods felt my original subject was false information, I can assure them that it was not intended to be.

I have also simply stopped using any AI tools in Photoshop for any photos I intend to post online. I'd rather take the extra time to edit my photos the way I have been for the last 25+ years than have my clients mistakenly think my photography is completely AI generated.

 

21 replies

Kevin Stohlmeyer
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 7, 2024

@SK321 Instagram has false flags with their AI tagging service that has been all over the news since it started. But to your arguement about "Made with AI" - black and white, you did use AI on your image so it's being identified as having AI in it.

SK321
SK321Author
Inspiring
June 7, 2024
quote

@SK321Instagram has false flags with their AI tagging service that has been all over the news since it started. But to your arguement about "Made with AI" - black and white, you did use AI on your image so it's being identified as having AI in it.


By @Kevin Stohlmeyer


"AI was used in this image" is completely different than "Made with AI". The latter would lead anyone to believe the image was completely AI generated. And as I said, I'll just go back to only using Content Aware Fill and doing my own adding/replacing if it's going to give my images that tag. If it had been made clear that your images would all be given that label if you used any AI at all, I would have never used the tool.

Conrad_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 14, 2024

I maintain that I paid for the tool, why can't I switch the tagging off? I can easily strip it, and I do, with exiftool. I wish I could patch it out of Photoshop.


quote

I maintain that I paid for the tool, why can't I switch the tagging off? I can easily strip it, and I do, with exiftool. I wish I could patch it out of Photoshop.

By @QINGCHARLES

 

The reason you can’t patch it out is because it’s commercial software. It’s rare for end users to be able to “patch out” anything they want in commercial software. If it’s a requirement for that to be possible, you can choose an open source tool where you can, by definition, freely patch anything. An option for that is an open source photo editor like the GIMP. Exiftool is open source software too.

 

For any commercial software, the fact that you “paid for the tool” guarantees nothing. The quote below is from the Adobe terms of use, but you’ll find language like it in the terms for pretty much any software that is commercial. (I added the bold formatting).

quote

Unless stated in the Product Specific Terms, the Services and Software are provided “AS-IS.”The Covered Parties further disclaim any warranty that (A) the Services and Software will meet your requirements or will be constantly available, uninterrupted, timely, secure, or error-free; (B) the results obtained from the use of the Services and Software will be effective, accurate, or reliable; (C) the quality of the Services and Software will meet your expectations; or (D) any errors or defects in the Services and Software will be corrected.

 

That said, Adobe does let users provide feedback publicly, and then can respond to it publicly, in the Ideas section of this community. There, many feature requests have been submitted and voted up by users. Adobe has put some of them into the software, and documents that in the release notes, linking back to the public Ideas thread where the change came from, so that there is some accountability.

 

If you want to be able to shut off all generative AI* (which I think is a reasonable idea), or at least have them change that “Made In” label, that Ideas forum would be a place to submit that feature request where it might have an effect (you might check to see if someone else already has).

 

*I know that you said you didn‘t bring up generative AI, but it is a fact that generative AI is the specific type that is causing the most controversy around rights, fakery, etc. today. Earlier types of AI in the software haven’t caused as much trouble, so it is actually important to make the distinction.