Skip to main content
Pattie-F
Legend
August 17, 2021
Question

P: Photoshop 3D features are being removed

  • August 17, 2021
  • 61 replies
  • 178192 views

 

As of Photoshop 22.5, released in August 2021, Photoshop’s 3D features will be discontinued. 3D features have enjoyed long success within Photoshop over the course of  10+ years, however the personal computing industry has recently been transitioning away from use of OpenGL  (having to do specifically with the use of GPUs, which is critical for 3D) toward native GPU APIs, which ultimately began the slow deterioration of Photoshop’s 3D features, all of which needed OpenGL. As difficult of a decision as removing 3D features from Photoshop is, the silver lining is that the next generation of 3D content creation tools from Adobe is already here. Check out the Substance line of 3D products.

 

For more details, please visit Photoshop discontinued 3D Q&A.

61 replies

Participant
August 26, 2021

Why in the hell would you discontinue Photoshop 3D features?! You don't offer any other legit 3D program, therefore, this is a major mistake. Thanks for nothing.

Ged_Traynor
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 26, 2021

Hi

You're not really addressing Adobe here as this is a user to user forum, did you read this

https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem/photoshop-3d-features-are-being-removed/td-p/12322748

davescm
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 28, 2021

Adobe has also discontinued it's Feedback site, so THIS is only place we can express our frustration at this jerk move. I used Photoshop 3D functionality all the time, and removing it because they're unwilling to do what's necessary to use the correct dlls/drivers/etc is a total jerk move.  Of course Adobe wants us all to move to Substance, and pay EXTRA for what we had in Photoshop just one generation back...  

It was better that I never had to leave PS to edit my 3D.


Complain by all means but be balanced in your comparison. Photoshop has never had the functionality of the Substance apps.

Photoshop at best had  limited extrusion capabilities, slow CPU based path tracing,  no physics simulations, noisy rendering.

It was a reasonable add on when it first came out in the, extra cost, CS Extended editions, but has not moved on or kept up with modern 3D applications, even the free ones such as Blender (which is excellent for modelling and rendering).

I took my first steps in 3D with Photoshop so am disappointed to see it go, but I can understand Adobe's decision to focus Photoshop's functionality on what it does best in a 3D workflow i.e. the 2D elements such as compositing.

 

Dave

 

 

 

 

Participant
August 24, 2021

I have been working with elements using the 3D options in photoshop for a long time and I find the argument that this option was slowing down photoshop dishonest because it was working perfectly until the last update this month which made it totally unusable.
You could have the honesty to say that you remove it to be able to sell your new pack especially for 3D and which is not included in the subscription of the CC. That you make evolve your tools it is comprehensible, but that it is done at the expense of the professional users who feed your business it is in my eyes a lack of respect.

 

davescm
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 24, 2021

Where is the argument made that 3D functionality "was slowing down Photoshop"? That is not what the original post or the FAQs state.

 

Dave

Participating Frequently
April 6, 2022

it states that technology is changing and because adobe programs were made years ago, the technology is becoming absolte. so instead of updated the technology you guys completely removed it and added another subscription fee. so to be fair, kevkevboy is not that far off - adobe is pretty much saying 3d stuff no longer works properly photoshop because technology is outdated. which is actually worse than what kevkevboy understood as slowing the program down.  

Participating Frequently
August 22, 2021

Will the price of my "All Apps" subscription which doesn't include the Substance line be reduced along with the reduction in features? Or will the Substance line be included in my "ALLLLL Apps" Subscription at no extra cost?

I suspect neither and I see less and less reason to continue my subscription at all. I'm pretty sure I can get what I need from Affinity, Blender, Quixel and Da Vinci for a fraction of the price.

Participating Frequently
April 6, 2022

^^^^^^^^

literally could not have said it better myself.

Sam Rohn
Participating Frequently
August 21, 2021

Spherical Panorama editing:

 

Affinity Photo has a working "Live Projection Equirectangular" spherical editing mode that seems well respected by many 360° photographers who found old PS 3D spherical edit mode slow and glitchy, it would be great if Adobe could make this work in Photoshop so we don't have to edit 360° panoramas in a different app 

 

https://affinity.help/photo/en-US.lproj/index.html?page=pages/LiveProjection/equirectangular.html?title=Equirectangular%20projection

 

https://youtu.be/ohYIIPR4JEw

Known Participant
August 20, 2021

Thta's good news makes it less bloated and one less unecessary item in my menu.

Maybe more focus on what is necessary. 

 

 

Known Participant
August 20, 2021

"We're producing 3D software now and want to force you to subscribe to it so we can milk $40-80 more per month from you."

Participating Frequently
April 6, 2022

lol anyone remeber when they had adobe demenison for free. now they wont even give 3d to people who pay for all apps. 

Participating Frequently
August 20, 2021

Adobe: "Well, we are removing all the 3D features from Photoshop, but for $40 a month, you can get them back!" This is the worst business idea ever. You never fail to surprise me.

Participating Frequently
April 6, 2022

literally ....... just terrible. not to mention there are tons of other 3d softwares that range from cheaper to free -_-

 

now i am paying for an adobe memebership to all apps that doesnt even include all the apps -_-

FATHER
Participant
August 20, 2021

Is this because of Metal?

Participant
August 20, 2021

Hi, I don't have anything against having the 3D features in a seperate program. - I am mostly interested in learning how to create modern (fantasy) 3D raster logos (with special effects) without needing to move into "more intensive 3D software" like Blender and Maya... Is this something that the new line will support?

helenb87994456
Participant
August 20, 2021

Hi there,

 

I have been buying and using mockup files to make product mockups of my cushion designs. These use images of rooms with 3D functions applied. This allows me to apply fabric designs to cushions in the images. I only use images that are real or look so real you almost can't tell the difference. I want the images to look as if my cushions are really in the image. I can't afford to have real product shots in real rooms yet.

If the 3D functions will no longer work in PS how do I get the same effect with the new apps? Can you use images in the same way? Ie do you warp the fabric design to follow the contours of the cushion and does the texture come through from the image of cushion fabric when you apply a fabric design? Or do you have to create a virtual 3D room from scratch?  I've seen some images from the new apps and they don't look real enough for my purpose. 

Also I've never actually created 3D effects, just used files that I bought and applied my designs.

Please can you advise?

Thankyou

 

Participating Frequently
April 6, 2022

seems the only advice they have is using an older version of photoshop -_- which wont wok for long

conceptgirl
Participant
August 20, 2021

This is so disappointing. The absence of the spherical pano will end my ability to work with a combination of photo and drawing! Hiding the tripod....no big deal ....but being able to move between spherical and flat painting and edits is crucial to my art. I really hope that Adobe will find a way to continue to support this process without strong-arming artists into purchasing additional software.