Skip to main content
InsomniakMedia
InsomniakMedia
Participating Frequently
January 24, 2018
Answered

Save For Web is slowing down my work flow

  • January 24, 2018
  • 2 replies
  • 4476 views

Hi,

I'm hoping someone can help, and I've done a search and nothing seems to fit what I'm wondering. I always save for web for all my photos after I finish editing with them. On my old Computer whenever I did that it would take a good 30secs-1min for the image to optimize and finally allow me to save it. I just built a new computer which is quite beastly, running and editing most images on M.2 Flash SSD or regular SSD when previously only on HDD. I thought it would be much faster, saving PSD certainly is, but saving for web remains the same speed, if it is faster I certainly can't notice it. All my other programs like premiere for video editing, and even just saving PSD has increased in speed dramatically but the save for web remains about the same. Can anyone help with a solution to speed this up?

To be fair I edit mostly 46/36 megapixel photos that have been exported as jpg on either capture one or LR at full size. My PSD files are usually 350mbs uncompressed. Is the big megapixel attributing to this? Even after I significantly upgraded my PC? How can there be no speed gain?

OLD PC:

  • I5-4760K
  • 16GB RAM 1300
  • 1tb HDD
  • GTX 660TI

NEW PC

  • i7-8700K
  • 32GB RAM 3200
  • 500GB M.2 Flash SSD
  • GTX 1070ti

Any tips would be appreciated, Thanks!

      This topic has been closed for replies.
      Correct answer D Fosse

      Save For Web is not designed for big files. This is for screen-sized images for web or mobile devices, 800 - 1500 pixels or so.

      For larger files, use a regular "Save As" to jpeg.

      That said, the new Export module should handle large files better - but this is still not intended for anything other than screen-sized images.

      2 replies

      NB, colourmanagement
      Community Expert
      NB, colourmanagementCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      May 30, 2024

      @InsomniakMedia I'd also prefer to archive my original as tiff or PSD, make a copy - resize the copy image correctly for its destination, then sharpen (unsharp mask) and now convert to sRGB and save as Jpeg, this gives you proper control over the process.

       

      I hope this helps
      neil barstow, colourmanagement net - adobe forum volunteer - co-author: 'getting colour right'
      google me "neil barstow colourmanagement" for lots of free articles on colour management
      Help others by clicking "Correct Answer" if the question is answered.
      Found the answer elsewhere? Share it here. "Upvote" is for useful posts.

        D Fosse
        Community Expert
        D FosseCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
        Community Expert
        January 24, 2018

        Save For Web is not designed for big files. This is for screen-sized images for web or mobile devices, 800 - 1500 pixels or so.

        For larger files, use a regular "Save As" to jpeg.

        That said, the new Export module should handle large files better - but this is still not intended for anything other than screen-sized images.

          U
          up_lifted
          Participant
          May 29, 2024

          I've been having this problem as well on my 2023 M2 Max macbook with 32g memory. I defiinitely don't remember having this issue on my old 2019 intel macbook. I understand the your reasoning for the Save for Web module not being designated for large files but isn't the point of the Save for Web function just that, to save files for web applications. Meaning, using the Save for Web module to control and manipulate those large files to be web applicable, thus "saving for the web"? I understand the new Export As... module looks like its somewhat similar in function to the Save for Web module. Just interesting to me that there doesn't seem to be much distinction between the two, imo. 

          L
          Lumigraphics
          Legend
          May 30, 2024

          Indeed.

           

          If they could just finish Export. It still has two major deal-breakers that have just been ignored for years. One, its color management is partly broken. Two, it still can't be recorded in actions.

           

          Those two effectively render it useless.

           

          In addition, some people have been annoyed at the simplified and much coarser jpeg compression scale, which doesn't allow fine tuning of the file size.


          I use SfW in production because Export (both versions) is useless.

          Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
          Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices