Script, Guides & Snap

[Guest]

Hello,
I am experiencing an issue of inaccurate magnetism with guides added in JavaScript. Here is an example:
1. I add two guides using the code below.
2. With Snap enabled, I draw a selection.
3. This selection should be 200px, but I often end up with 201px.
4. If I manually add the guides, everything is fine.
Does anyone know where this problem comes from?

app.activeDocument.guides.add (Direction.HORIZONTAL, 600);
app.activeDocument.guides.add (Direction.HORIZONTAL, 800);

 

[pixxxelschubser]

Please show your ruler unit.

[r-bin · Accepted solution]

Yes, a really interesting bug.

Try using this code to add guides.

var d = new ActionDescriptor();
var d1 = new ActionDescriptor();
d1.putUnitDouble(stringIDToTypeID("position"), stringIDToTypeID("pixelsUnit"), 600);
d1.putEnumerated(stringIDToTypeID("orientation"), stringIDToTypeID("orientation"), stringIDToTypeID("horizontal"));
d.putObject(stringIDToTypeID("new"), stringIDToTypeID("guide"), d1);
executeAction(stringIDToTypeID("make"), d, DialogModes.NO);


var d = new ActionDescriptor();
var d1 = new ActionDescriptor();
d1.putUnitDouble(stringIDToTypeID("position"), stringIDToTypeID("pixelsUnit"), 800);
d1.putEnumerated(stringIDToTypeID("orientation"), stringIDToTypeID("orientation"), stringIDToTypeID("horizontal"));
d.putObject(stringIDToTypeID("new"), stringIDToTypeID("guide"), d1);
executeAction(stringIDToTypeID("make"), d, DialogModes.NO);

The snap seems to be working as it should.

[Guest]

Thank you @r-bin 

Should I conclude that ActionDescriptor is the way to go when possible?

[r-bin]

Thank you @r-bin 

Should I conclude that ActionDescriptor is the way to go when possible?

By @Deleted User

You didn’t specify whether, when creating guides using this code, everything is fine with snapping the selection to the guides?

Classic DOM methods, such as guides.add(), are based (according to unverified rumors) on AM code and the use of ActionDescriptor and executeAction. So if it is more convenient in the code, then it is not forbidden to use it. However, as you yourself noticed in your case, there may be some oddities and bugs when using only DOM methods.

[Guest]

@r-bin

Yes, with the code above, everything is fine.

Thank you for the help and the explanation, I will keep this in mind in the future.

@Stephen Marsh

I had tried what you recommend before posting, without success. In fact, guides seem well positioned, the problem is the magnetism on these guides.

[Stephen Marsh]

What happens when you explicitly set the ruler units via the DOM (which is always a good practice)?

var origRulerUnits = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;
app.activeDocument.guides.add (Direction.HORIZONTAL, 600);
app.activeDocument.guides.add(Direction.HORIZONTAL, 800);
app.preferences.rulerUnits = origRulerUnits;

[r-bin]

---

@Stephen Marsh wrote:

What happens when you explicitly set the ruler units via the DOM (which is always a good practice)?

That's not the point.

P.S. A good practice would be to use UnitValue(800, "px") instead of just 800. But that doesn't help in this case.

[Stephen Marsh]

As this appears to be an ExtendScript DOM issue, I was curious to see what happens with the UXP DOM as a .psjs in v2024:

https://developer.adobe.com/photoshop/uxp/2022/ps_reference/classes/guides/#add

It's a shame that I couldn't get a result!

[r-bin]

It looks like I found the cause of this "bug".

Guides created through DOM and AM code are no different.

This is confirmed by a bit-by-bit comparison of psd files with such guides.

When using DOM guides.add(), some internal information is not updated and it appears that the SnapTo function does not see or know about the new guides.

If you save the file and then Revert or re-open it, then SnapTo starts working as it should for such guides.

This is definitely a bug.