Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Community,
I am working on an image which already has a smart filter for Camera Raw.
In addition to this filter, I want another one -Surface Blur- but I want to mask this one out so it shows just in certain areas of the image. Doing so impacts the Camera Raw, which I want to be applied on the whole image and not having it mask.
Is there a way to create multiple smart filters in one layer? Or another way to go about which I am not thinking of?
Thanks
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Correct, you can only have one smart filter mask per layer.
So the workaround is "New Smart Object via Copy":
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
sweet thanks, i'll try tonight. I appreciate for the reply
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You can only have one smart filter on a layer BUT, nobody is stopping from nesting a smart object into another smart object.
So you have one blur on a smart object, then you right click and go "convert to smart object" and magic, you have another brand new blank smart object, onto which you can add another smart filter, any of which can be masked differently...
(and so on and on, I don't know if there is actually a limit to multi-nesting, apart loosing your sanity after the 20th 🙂 )
Good luck!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, absolutely. Nested smart objects is also a good way to do it.
I agree with the OP that it should be possible to mask each individual smart filter. This might make a good topic for Ideas. I'd vote for it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Actually I had to do it a couple of times for a project, and I used your solution (new smart object via copy) and mine combined.
I also sometimes use groups within groups where each subgroup is masked differently (nothing to do with smart objects in particular, but one can also mix the two solutions).
Sometimes it's a question of trying things out and see how much it can be pushed 😁.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I wanted to suggest out the very same answer @Imaginerie did.
It is tedious, reminds me when we were nesting layers in groups and sub-groups to have multiple individual masks.
Dag, how would new smart object via copy work for this kind of work, you'd need to mask it, rather than the filter, or play with blending modes?
@D Fosse you can vote here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-ideas/p-ability-to-apply-masks-to-individual-smar...
Camera Raw is showing how masks should work: parametric, multiple, combinations... The masking concept of Photoshop needs a rejuvination!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, when I saw masking in ACR & Lr, I thought wow, I'd buy that! 😁
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now