Skip to main content
Participant
December 8, 2019
Question

Smoothing out texture light reflections from fine art photos

  • December 8, 2019
  • 5 replies
  • 3975 views

I am a fine art painter. One of the banes of my existence is getting good photographs of my work for use in promotions and making high quality prints. I have spent hours rephotographing paintings trying to get lighting just right to avoid reflections and variations in light intensity. Believe me, there is nothing more difficult to photograph than fine art. No matter how you position lights or use polarizing filters, there are always reflections off the textured surfaces somewhere in the painting. I need to find a fix in Photoshop to improve these images. I have attached a somewhat extreme example of this problem. It is a photograph of a wall mural I just finished for a charity here in Las Vegas. I need to have a really good photograph for promotional and news release purposes. Because this is on a wall, and it is large, I am limited as to what I can do lighting-wise to improve the photograph ( I have taken dozens and this is the best). If you zoom in on areas, particularly on the left and right side, you can see washout of the color on the tops of the wall texture. How can I reduce, or eliminate these reflective defects without totally losing texture details? Thanks in advance for any help you might afford me.

This topic has been closed for replies.

5 replies

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 10, 2019

In that case the "cheating" option may be the best bet.

 

Put the camera on a steady tripod. Set up the lights as before, make sure they are pointed to the far edge. Turn on one of the lights. Shoot. Turn it off, and turn on the other. Shoot.

 

Stack them in Photoshop, zoom in and nudge to make sure they are perfectly aligned. Then put the top layer in Darken blend mode.

 

I assume you shoot raw for this, not jpeg. You get the best result if you compensate for the light falloff with a simple gradient in ACR/Lightroom, and otherwise match the two exposures closely.

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 9, 2019

Just an additional comment to clarify: the main problem you have here is one of angles. You have a too steep angle from the lights to the artwork, hence the hot spots. This can happen if it's a very large work - or a small room - and you don't have enough space to get the lights out to the sides. Very often you have more room vertically, and bouncing the light from the ceiling solves the problem.

Participant
December 10, 2019

I have tried bouncing the light off the ceiling but it tends to illuminate the top of the painting more than the bottom. This too is something that probably benefits from having a large room with a high ceiling.

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 8, 2019

Here's a neat trick: put a steep curves layer on top. This will immediately reveal uneven lighting and other problems. Add anothe layer underneath to correct using masks and soft brushes, painting in the correction.

What you have here is classic "hot spots". I don't know how big this is, or how much of the wall it takes up - but in cases like this I always try to bounce the light from the ceiling. If that's not possible, position your lights as far away as you can to the sides. Diffusion (soft boxes etc) are actually not recommended here - it will only increase unwanted reflections. What you want here is point light sources. The smaller the better.

 

If everything else fails, cheat. Shoot twice, with light from either side. Stack them in Darken blend mode. You need to have them both corrected first for light falloff.

 

You mention polarizers, but have you tried cross-polarizing? In addition to the polarizer on the lens, you put polarizing film on the lights. Obviously, that needs to be flash units, or perhaps LED; otherwise the heat will melt the film. Mounted at right angles to each other, this will kill almost any reflection. You also lose 4-5 stops of exposure. Here's an example:

 

Photographing artwork is a huge subject. I work as photographer at an art museum, and I constantly need to invent new techniques. There's always a new problem. But yes, the eternal enemy is reflections. 80% of it is getting rid of reflections - the rest is getting rid of shadows. Or the other way round - it depends 😉

Participant
December 9, 2019

Thanks for the advice! I learned a few of the lighting things you mentioned the hard way, lots and lots of images. In the case of this mural, it is a large mural in a small space so light angles were definitely a problem. I had heard about the cross polarization idea before and I would like to try it. Unfortunately it will have to wait a while (starving artist). In the mean time I will try your post photo suggestions. Not sure what a steep curves layer is (noob), but I will look it up and let you know how it works. Nice to know I am not the only one suffering the ravages of fine art photography.

Derek Cross
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 8, 2019

Can't you scan them?

Participant
December 9, 2019

Nope, my paintings tend toward the large side. None will fit in a scanner.

Bojan Živković11378569
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 8, 2019

Since you do not have problem to photograph again paintings I will recommend to you to try with diffusers which can hep you to photograph without reflections. It is not expensive gear and you can also DIY. Search on internet on topic and probably you will find solution. Personally I am using paus or tracing paper from time to time to soften source light and avoid highlights.

Participant
December 9, 2019

Tried diffusers and I still got reflections. They do help keeping the lighting consistent though.