Skip to main content
Participant
May 20, 2009
Question

What is the best format for printing?

  • May 20, 2009
  • 3 replies
  • 49081 views

Hi,

I want to print my work. my destination is laser printer in RGB mode. I confused rather I should use Photoshop PDF or TIFF. As I understand PDF includes lots of feature that are not relevant to Photoshop. TIFF in the other hand is a simple and none compressive format that should make the job well.

Any input will be welcome.

S

    3 replies

    Michael D Sullivan
    Inspiring
    May 22, 2009

    There is a lossless version of the JPEG image file format (it doesn't use JPEG compression), but it isn't implemented in much if any software, including Photoshop.  Even at the highest quality levels, JPEG compression causes some alteration in some pixels, but at the highest quality setting, the alteration will be very slight and should not be visible even in contrasty areas.

    The downside of JPEG vs. PDF is that JPEG files cannot contain vectors, so all vector shapes, and more importantly all text, will be rasterized; PDF files can contain vector shapes and text fonts.  If the printing shop uses a RIP or a Postscript printer, the vector content will be printed at the printer's highest resolution, which will likely be higher than the resolution of the rasterized image.

    May 22, 2009

    Not to start an argument but I'll give my opinion.  Majority of my work is portraits and weddings.  As I work on files I save as psd's.  Once I'm POSITIVE I'm finished I save as jpgs, highest quality.  Those I save to CD and external hard-drive.  In the event that I need to do additional work on one of those jpg's, at a later date, I again work it as a psd until finished.  I then save it as a tif to avoid any further degrading of that file.

    My point, right or wrong, is that I don't see any degrading of files saved once  at highest quality jpg.  That said, I never (never say never) save as a jpg twice.

    sami1979Author
    Participant
    May 22, 2009

    It always seems so obvious not to use jpg for printing. jpg purpose in this world is to zip image data, not to deliver the file for printing.

    Should be mentioned that PDF is another option. I don’t see sense to use it for only one image. It has lots of options among compressing (or not). But it still goes to jpg. I still don’t see it as a replacement for TIFF.

    Hope it didn’t make big waves J

    S

    w3jxp-V4L7UU
    Participant
    May 20, 2009

    Not enough information! Is this a local printer (one attached to your computer)? Are you sending it out to a printer?

    If it's local and your printing from Photoshop,  the format doesn't matter. If your sending it out to a commercial printer, then the proper thing is to ask them what format they would like.

    John

    sami1979Author
    Participant
    May 21, 2009

    Sorry. its commercial printer. i did ask them but thay told me "Jpg is fine". so i could not  relay on thier knowladge.

    May 21, 2009

    Why not?  Your question was what format.  Their answer is jpg.  jpg's can not contain layers.  Is that a problem?