P: Ability to snap to Pixel for shape/layer creation and transform

20 Votes
LEGEND ,
Mar 31, 2011 Mar 31, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I would love the addition of 'Pixel' to the 'Snap To' family. It seems like this feature would have been a shoo in from the onset of Photoshop with it being a bitmap based image editor...

Idea Released
TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

70

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Apr 19, 2012 Apr 19, 2012
This is now a preferences in Photoshop CS6:

Votes

Translate

Translate
22 Comments
Participant ,
Mar 31, 2011 Mar 31, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I assume you're talking about vector path/shape pixel snapping, as the bitmap tools mostly snap to pixel anyway? If so, then I'm all for it. Most of the time I want everything to snap to pixels.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Apr 01, 2011 Apr 01, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Precisely. I think the default should be for everything to snap to pixels. It gets tedious having to make so many 3200% adjustments just because a path is off the pixel by a tiny bit.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Apr 05, 2011 Apr 05, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Smart snapping to nearest pixel when resizing a shape would be particularly useful for icon design.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Apr 08, 2011 Apr 08, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Snap to pixel is extremely useful for icon designers and would be great if it was available on all shapes.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Apr 17, 2011 Apr 17, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Good one. I can't believe this isn't available yet (I almost thought I read somewhere that it was?). I hate creating a vector box (with rounded corners usually -- but that's besides the point), and usually 2 edges aren't hard edges (i.e., aren't snapped to a specific pixel). Then I have to either nudge it a few times after zooming in, or create guides before I even create the shape (so that it will snap to the guide(s) I dragged out.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Apr 17, 2011 Apr 17, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Exactly. It Becomes VERY time consuming when you have to adjust every element.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Apr 17, 2011 Apr 17, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

By the way, here's a "hack" to snap to pixels in Photoshop when transforming: http://edwardsanchez.me/blog/text/126...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
Apr 17, 2011 Apr 17, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks for the tip. I'll try that out tomorrow (until Adobe makes it easier). Also, the bit about having a second window for the same document/file is pretty neat too!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
May 05, 2011 May 05, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As an added idea to this - is the ability to select nodes and choose "move nodes to nearest pixel"

Suggested implementation:
http://edw.me/1u0X3Z24180V0h1d0U05

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
May 05, 2011 May 05, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You do know that the rectangle and rounded rectangle tools already have an option to snap to pixels when you create them, right?


Image is not available



Could you be more specific about what tools and areas still need a snap to pixel option?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Participant ,
May 05, 2011 May 05, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

When resizing, whether it's with selecting the edges and dragging, or just selecting the edges and nudging with the arrow keys. I want to be able to nudge a full pixel at a time, to keep a clean hard edge.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
May 05, 2011 May 05, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I know about that. But I'm talking about transformation. Often I'll draw a large icon, then when I resize it down I have to spend ages nudging the nodes to the pixel so the icons appear crisp.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
May 06, 2011 May 06, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Chris Cox: Yep :)

Sure. Basically, almost all of the time, I want everything to snap to pixels; Vector, Type and Selection tools at least. Also when doing things like Transforming shapes, nudging points, etc.

Thanks for joining in on the discussions and caring about your product and your users 🙂

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 26, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I wish the direct select tool had an option to "snap to pixels," even when I zoom in. I still haven't found a use case when I would ever want to move a vector point half a pixel.

Photoshop is a raster/pixel based software, so it would be great to make everything snap the pixel grid. No more blurry edges for me please!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 26, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Snap to pixel is usually only desirable in the limited case of doing design for on-screen UI. For print and most other workflows, snapping to whole pixels is an undesirable feature.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 26, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Limited case?? Almost every web designer I know uses Photoshop as their primary design tool. As there is a snap to pixel option when creating a new shape, so it doesn't seem like a stretch to keep that as the default for other vector adjustments too

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 26, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think Chris was trying to say it's not something a 100% of our users would want. Photoshop's largest customer segment uses Photoshop for photography, so in that sense, it's not the majority of users. He acknowledged that it would be desirable for on-screen design for UI (i.e. web design). We get that web designers want this. 🙂

Senior Product Manager - Customer Advocacy - Digital Imaging

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Oct 26, 2011 Oct 26, 2011

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Think about how many people use Photoshop. Now what fraction of those are doing on-screen UI design? Only that limited set of users want snap to pixel behavior (and even some of them don't when they're designing for high res).
What you describe as "blur" is antialiasing (rendering fractions of pixels) - which is the right thing to do for the majority of work.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jan 06, 2012 Jan 06, 2012

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Nearly every web designer I know (and I'm sure a huge number I don't know) uses Photoshop... that's a lot of users. For every single one of them sub pixel shapes like that become an issue. You're right it is not the right behaviour in a number of situations, but it certainly is necessary as an option. Having 'snap to pixels' in the view menu would be a really nice start

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 01, 2012 Mar 01, 2012

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Took me a while to find this thread. I was beginning to think I was the only person that wanted this (And have wanted it since I started Web Design 10 years ago)!

The "Snap to Pixels" option is NOT available for the vector line tool.
Seriously, this is FUNDAMENTAL for Web-Designers and if your using the marquee/fill method of creating shapes/masking, then ... well, this is just not best practices.

If Adobe doesn't incorporate this into CS6, then, simply put, there are not paying attention. Adobe, if your listening. DO IT!!!!!!! It will not cannibalize Illustrator!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Mar 02, 2012 Mar 02, 2012

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I second this.

If i may add one more suggestion to this.

"keyboard movements"

currently if you move a PATH using the keyboard increments are dependent on how zoomed you are, and if you hold shift its a big jump. we need on more modifier. call it command+L/R/U/D to move 1 pixel.

I'm adding this a request to a separate thread as i think its a little different.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Apr 19, 2012 Apr 19, 2012

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
This is now a preferences in Photoshop CS6:


Senior Product Manager - Customer Advocacy - Digital Imaging

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report